Sorry, I was attempting in some roundabout way, to tease the Hamilton ...
Andrew's use of "weeping" is a little sentimental but that is all - I
can't see the beef. Or the grief, really. If you think the poem is
"simpler, prettier, cleaner" without, or other elements. Then it's a
different poem. In any event, who made you teech?
This is art. I think poets are liars. They shouldn't be under any
burden to tell things as they are, let alone played upon the blue
guitar.
Roger
On 10/12/06, biloxi andersen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 10/12/06, Roger Day <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > In a rare case of wikipedia not being up to snuff, I bring you this:
> >
> > http://www.goscote.co.uk/goscote/trees/html/trees.htm
> >
> > At least 10 different forms of weeping tree. Including, in Australia,
> > the "weeping lilly pilly". there's also the Weeping Golden Ash.
> >
> > I am in any event horticulturally challenged; I have been known to
> > kill more cure.
> > Roger
>
> We're not only horticulturally challenged, but English isn't even our
> native tongue.
>
--
http://www.badstep.net/
http://www.cb1poetry.org.uk/
Suspicion breeds confidence
|