JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CASELOADMIDWIFERY Archives


CASELOADMIDWIFERY Archives

CASELOADMIDWIFERY Archives


CASELOADMIDWIFERY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CASELOADMIDWIFERY Home

CASELOADMIDWIFERY Home

CASELOADMIDWIFERY  October 2006

CASELOADMIDWIFERY October 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: [MCVic] Caseload models

From:

Jean Greer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Caseload midwifery <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:26:58 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (179 lines)

Dear Sarah,
Nine years ago, in resonse to Changing Childbirth, the DOH offered a small 
grant to all matenity services to develop a model of care that would provide 
continuity of carer to 'low risk' women.  We applied for this and used it to 
develop our partnership caseload team.  An accurate economic evaluation of 
the service is very difficult as many of the costs/benefits are difficult to 
quantify, but where it has been attempted caseload service is believed to be 
cost neutral.  The 6 midwives on our team were core staff before the team 
was set up so the total number of midwives employed by the trust was 
unchanged, it is only the manner in which the midwives work that is 
different.  The number of women we look after has been determined by the 
Dept of Manpower Services who advise that 1 full time equivalent midwife is 
employed for every 35 women booked.  There are undoubtably additional costs 
but they are small e.g.
1  All midwives were employed at a higher grade. (I suspect AforC, when it's 
eventually implemented, will neutralise this benefit.)
2  All midwives are paid an on-call allowance.
3  All midwives have mobile phones provided by the Trust.
4  All midwives claim a mileage allowance for home visits.
To counter these costs I suggest you argue that all evaluations of caseload 
teams have consistently shown:
1  An increased normal delivery rate.
2  A reduced epidural rate and a reduction in other interventions in labour.
3  Shorter stays in hospital.
4  An increased breastfeeding rate.
5  Increased satisfaction with the service.
It will be argued that in these evaluations the benefits did not reach 
statistical significance, but this was often only because the sample sizes 
were of necessity small and many studies had insufficient power.  Also no 
studies focused on the problems of practicing normal midwifery in a 
consultant-led labour ward.  In the recent national audit the RJMS had the 
distinction of having the highest c/s rate in the UK.   Rome wasn't built in 
a day but it was built!!  Unfortunately, as you can see, the costs are 
easier for an accountant to quantify than the benefits.
Trusts in N. Ireland have the same economic constraints as the rest of the 
NHS, but the RJMS is still able to offer one to one midwifery support for 
all women in labour.   If I was you I would argue that a woman may as well 
have a midwife she knows as one she doesn't - the cost to the NHS is exactly 
the same!
Good luck!!!
Jean Greer
Caseload Team
Royal/Jubilee Maternity Service
Belfast




>From: Sarah Hunt <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Caseload midwifery <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [MCVic] Caseload models
>Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:15:10 +0000
>
>Dear Jean,
>We would very much like to set up a Caseload scheme here in Gloucestershire 
>but our managers and employers tell us that it is not cost effective as our 
>hospital is already staffed and having your own midwife with you during 
>labour means your are potentially paying 2 midwives. How was your scheme 
>set up and how have you overcome the 'costs' argument? I wonder whether 
>Northern Ireland Maternity Service is in the same grip of financial cuts as 
>we are in England?
>
>Sarah Hunt, Community Midwife, Gloucestershire
>
>
>>From: Jean Greer <[log in to unmask]>
>>Reply-To: Caseload midwifery <[log in to unmask]>
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: [MCVic] Caseload models
>>Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:12:27 +0100
>>
>>Hello Karen,
>>I am one of a team of 6 caseload midwives working in the Royal/Jubilee 
>>Maternity Service, Belfast, N. Ireland.   We all work full time and each 
>>carry a personal caseload of 35 - 38 women per year.  We work in pairs 
>>sharing the on-call with our work partner.   The service is targeted at 
>>'low risk women' and is midwifery-led, but we continue to provide 
>>midwufery care for the women on our caseloads who develop complications 
>>and whose care becomes consultant led.  Antenatal and postnatal care can 
>>be provided at home or in hospital.  All babies are born in hospital.  
>>This service has been up and running for 8 years now, and is very popular 
>>- with all midwives fully booked.
>>Good luck with the research and ler us know if we can be of any 
>>assistance.
>>Jean Greer
>>
>>
>>>From: Marlene Gryesten / Aalborg Sygehus <[log in to unmask]>
>>>Reply-To: Caseload midwifery <[log in to unmask]>
>>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>>Subject: [MCVic] Caseload models
>>>Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:35:55 +0200
>>>
>>>Hi Karen
>>>On a note from Denmark.
>>>Currently I am one of the two midwife team in a 120 cases caseload, all 
>>>women living in the same district and doing birth at our local university 
>>>hospital or at home. We have worked since june 1, 2004; We have made a 
>>>peticulous evaluation on all work time through two years as we started 
>>>this model as a work load project. Now in Denmark there is three other 
>>>teams working and on our National Midwifery Congress November 6, we will 
>>>debate, amongst other stuff, wether Caseload midwifer needs to be 
>>>implemented as a part of the care offered from most midwiferycenters.
>>>Ou first report was on client satisfaction, second on work envirenmental, 
>>>and the final one soon to be published is including a focus interview 
>>>regarding some of the fun sideeffects! Like a rise in Homebirth, and 
>>>again the final count up on oncall hours versus actual work hours - all 
>>>in danish!
>>>The things we discuss in Denmark now is, first and foremost:
>>>
>>>- How it is possibel to work being on call 50% of your life, and still 
>>>function well! The evaluation of our workstudy shows, that the quality of 
>>>work life will increase for certain midwifes as the above quality and 
>>>selfsatisfaction of the continuity of care is a strengthener in it self, 
>>>and with a caseload of 120 women, our average oncall load is 3 and a half 
>>>our per 24 hour oncall period.
>>>-Since we know this model will never be a possibility for all pregnat 
>>>women, then how do we decide who should have the possibility /choice ?
>>>
>>>All for now, good luck
>>>Marlene Gryesten
>>>Aalborg-Denmark
>>>
>>>
>>>________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi Karen
>>>Birralee Maternity Service at Box Hill hospital has a small caseload 
>>>group.
>>>Maternity Coalition published an article about it Birth Matters Vol 10.1
>>>March 06 'Know your midwife at Birralee' (authors Melody Bourne, Alice
>>>Barden and Helen Gordon.) Nic Dutton is one of the midwives in KYM there 
>>>and
>>>could fill you in with more information.
>>>My (very biased) observation:
>>>Most of the hospital midwives I have spoken to about caseload seem to 
>>>think
>>>it's a dirty word. Midwifery managers seem to like to stick to rosters, 
>>>and
>>>talk about their wonderful team models.
>>>There is a UK email list Caseload midwifery 
>>>[log in to unmask]
>>>It has been quiet lately, but would be a link with international work.  I
>>>have put a cc to that list - I think I'm still on it.
>>>You always come up with interesting big words.  I learnt reciprocity from
>>>you, and now you'll have me talking about interdisciplinarity!
>>>All the best
>>>Joy Johnston
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Karen Lane [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, 11 October 2006 1:23 PM
>>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>>Subject: [MCVic] Caseload models
>>>
>>>Hello out there,
>>>
>>>I was wondering if people could advise what hospitals are using
>>>caseload models or preparing to install caseload?
>>>
>>>I want to construct a national research study of interdisciplinarity
>>>in health care using caseload in maternity care as an case study.
>>>
>>>If you are aware of international cases, I would also be grateful for
>>>that information.
>>>
>>>Many thanks,
>>>
>>>Karen Lane
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! 
>>http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™ Messenger has arrived. Click here to download it for free! 
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/?locale=en-gb

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

November 2018
March 2018
September 2017
August 2017
April 2017
November 2016
August 2016
July 2016
November 2015
July 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
August 2014
July 2014
May 2014
February 2014
September 2013
June 2013
March 2013
February 2013
August 2012
July 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
April 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
September 2007
July 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager