Research at Manchester Business School
CMS5 Conference - Hegemonies
CMS 5
The Fifth International Critical Management Studies Conference
11-13 July 2007
For further information contact us at [log in to unmask]
Reconnecting Critical Management
The Fifth Critical Management Studies Conference, Manchester Business School
Call for papers
Stream title: Movements of Transition: hegemonies, resistances,
alternatives
Stream Description
The transition from ‘socialism’ to a free market economy has probably been
one of the most pivotal events over the past two decades, affecting the
lives of millions of people inside and outside the countries and nations
involved in this process. This transition has been part of a wider movement
towards the widening and deepening of the logic of neo-liberal states, free
markets and capitalist management around the world. In popular imagination
this societal change process has been frequently portrayed as the
archetypal journey from serfdom to freedom with certain teleological
references to the ‘end of history’. Reflecting the Zeitgeist of drastic
transformations set in motion by the disintegrating Soviet model (and its
variants), the free market ideology has captured the minds of its reluctant
allies and foes alike. Unanimously embraced as an antidote to the
inefficiency and irresponsiveness of state bureaucracies, and (the only)
tool for wealth creation, but also as an emancipatory political force – the
free market has been elevated to the status of the new master signifier in
societal discourse. In this new ‘post-historical’ world the free market and
its associated capitalist management processes in the state, economy and
civil society have become the hegemonic articulation of organisation as
such, promising freedom, democracy, wealth and even equality,
responsibility and security.
Perhaps such grand transformation with high moral underpinnings at stake
justifies the ‘transitory’ human costs: the tears, broken dreams and
anxieties; the massive unemployment, religious hatred and nationalist wars;
the military and daily violences, poverty and disillusions. Perhaps the TV
images transmitted to unsuspected consumers in the making – those ‘poor’
souls who are yet to fully experience the promised land of Big Macs and big
Mercs – might eventually materialise turning the catastrophic wastelands of
the present into dreamlands of the future. Perhaps the many liberations
that privatisation of state industries have brought about together with
privatising common fates has been a price worth paying. Or we are made to
believe so…
In contrast to prevailing ideologies, we would like to question this notion
of transition as an imposition of historical, a-historical or pseudo-
historical truths onto our reality and subjectivity. We see transition –
transformation, reconfiguration, repositioning – as a particular change
process, a personal and collective one at the same time, that is concerned
with the real opening of and in society. Moving beyond nostalgia and
critique, we look out for rupture/s in the symbolic order and wish to
interrogate imaginary institutions of contemporary consumerist society with
the hope of experiencing the real; the real being defined as a resistance
to dominant discourses pertaining to market fundamentalism and neo-
liberalism, and as a quest for alternative ways of being, organising and
constituting public space.
Our aim is to challenge the distortion that equates collective and
agonistic forms of action with tyranny and coercion, and to identify ways
of resisting hegemonic discourses and share alternative experiences. We are
interested in movements of transition that point to speculative openings:
new ways of social organising, new ways of producing, new ways of being. We
are excited to explore the creativity and innovation of social movements in
all parts of the world resisting the neo-liberal market logic and, at the
same time, experimenting with the organisation of new, alternative forms of
life.
Trying to make sense of a wider change process involving new forms of
citizenship and collective engagement, we would like to invite
contributions that problematise, re-think and re-define different notions
of transition, including:
The historical epoch of social transformation from what was known as ‘real
existing socialism’ to today’s (post-)transition market economies –
examining and evaluating the significance of social and organisational
transformations in light of foreclosed and recreated opportunities for
radical movements of transition;
The liberalisation and structural adjustment policies implemented in many
developing countries around the world – examining and evaluating the human,
social, cultural and economic costs involved and documenting the movements
of resistance against neo-colonial oppressions;
The ‘successful’ Marx-to-Mao-to-Market transition as experienced in China –
teasing out the historical complexities and hidden costs of this change
process with particular emphasis on the different types of resistances
possible in today’s Chinese society;
The ‘forced’ and violent transition in countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq
and Kosovo – not to mention Nicaragua, Panama, Grenada and the many other
countries where Western hegemony has invaded foreign territories in the
name of liberation, freedom and democracy.
While we would not like to confine our inquiry to the historical
transitions outlined above, we would particularly welcome analyses of:
Comparative aspects of transition across countries and geographical areas
and between different models of transition (e.g. ‘successful’ and ‘failed’
ones);
The roles of, and the relationships between, the state, economy and civil
society in organising societal transitions and change processes;
The mechanisms for establishing hegemonic regimes and organising counter-
hegemonic resistance movements;
The role of particular organisations (e.g. NGOs, charities, affinity
groups, direct action groups, media organisations) in facilitating
hegemonic as well as counter-hegemonic transitions;
The modes of organisation in what can be regarded as alternative states,
economies and civil societies.
We are inviting a range of creative and innovative engagements including
contributions such as:
Theoretical papers presenting counterintuitive and provocative analyses and
ideas using a range of frameworks (e.g. feminist, post-colonial, neo-
Gramscian, post-Marxist, etc);
Empirical engagements presenting data and texts in novel and non-
conventional ways;
Individual accounts by researchers, practitioners, artists and activists
presenting their own personal and auto-biographic stories and experiences
of transitions;
Artistic projects using techniques of performance, video, poetry and
photography;
Activist accounts of social movement organising, resistance and alternative
institution building.
Details of the Convenors:
Dr Marianna Fotaki
Manchester Business School
[log in to unmask]
Dr Steffen Böhm
Essex University
[log in to unmask]
Professor John Hassard
Manchester Business School
[log in to unmask]
Professor Maria Ceci Misoczky
School of Administration, Federal University do Rio Grande du Sul
Porto Alegre, Brazil
[log in to unmask]
Nebojša Milikic
Editor of ''YEAST'', the youth web-magazine for politics and culture
Belgrade, Serbia
[log in to unmask]
Timeline for paper submission:
Abstracts to Convenors (e-mail) - 6 November 2006
Decisions on acceptance/rejection communicated to authors - 14 February 2007
Full papers to Convenors (e-mail) - 28 April 2007
Abstracts must contain the following information:
Authors (including affiliation and contact details, with lead author
clearly indicated)
Stream to which the abstract is submitted
Title
Body text
Maximum 300 words
All abstracts must be single-spaced, prepared using at least an 11-point
Ariel font, with a left margin at least 1 inch for binding and be formatted
for A4 paper (21cm * 29.7 cm).
|