Name and shame the FLO. if he has been sidelined then it is truth and not
leaving yourself open to Liable
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve@DDL" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: [BRITARCH] A MD day at the Thornborough Henges
> The FLO in question has now been side shuffled into an non FLO position
> within the County.
> All I will say is that the said FLO's Ebay sellers ID was Adrianus...
> By the way as an aside on your comment that I would not say the same to a
> detectorist, I had actually sent an email to the seller this morning
> explaining my dissapointement and I also made a post on the UKDN to the
> same extent, which others have agreed with.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rob" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 1:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [BRITARCH] A MD day at the Thornborough Henges
>> Can you give us more details because this one slipped me by. That said I
>> would be on that FLO's case as much as I am your fraternities
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Steve@DDL" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 12:21 PM
>> Subject: Re: [BRITARCH] A MD day at the Thornborough Henges
>>> It has just occured to me that if I was going to be mean spirited and
>>> wanted to lash out the archaeolical community in the same manner that
>>> Paul and Nigel habitually lash out at the detecting fraternity and those
>>> that try to look further than the age old arguements such as progressive
>>> archaeologists like David Connolly....
>>> Why dont we also bring into the equation the recent case of the PAS FLO
>>> that was selling antiquities and had a thriving business going on Ebay?
>>> This event was actually brough to light by a well known detectorist, but
>>> instead of using it as ammunition to malign the PAS or the
>>> archaeological community he contacted PAS directly and allowed them to
>>> deal with it quietly, in house... and was thanked by the PAS supremo for
>>> doing so!
>>> This was later made public by another source...
>>> However why not the same hue and cry from the Paul and Nigel on this
>>> matter, they are well aware of it...
>>> Why not, because it rather inconveniently does not suit their agenda...
>>> as does this other single incedent by the detectorist.
>>> Nasty... no wonder little progress has been made over the years whilke
>>> these two maliscious mongerers are allowed to continue wihtout issue by
>>> their peers.
>>> Hats off to David for having the balls that many others lack in standing
>>> up publicly and making his account.
>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>> Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/458 - Release Date:
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.407 / Virus Database: 268.12.9/458 - Release Date: 27/09/2006