I guessed that should be the case.
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 05:06:11 +0100, Rob <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>No it shouldn't be discarded. Whilst it may not be usefull in a contextual
>way it may have uses in another. It would be written in a report as other
>I agree though that if digs are to be done they should be done thoroughly
>and not like TT do although I did note that the MD's tended to only scan the
>spoil heaps when the machine was being used to strip top soil or spits