No it shouldn't be discarded. Whilst it may not be usefull in a contextual
way it may have uses in another. It would be written in a report as other
I agree though that if digs are to be done they should be done thoroughly
and not like TT do although I did note that the MD's tended to only scan the
spoil heaps when the machine was being used to strip top soil or spits
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Radley" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2006 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [BRITARCH] Big Royal Dig
I take this as a "Yes" then ?
Once an item is in the spoil heap, it is no longer of any importance
whatsoever, and can be discarded ?
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:06:22 +0100, Alan Radley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I don't wish to labour the point, but :-
>We are saying that once an item (no matter what it's historical value may
>be) is in the spoil heap and has no accurate context, it should be left
>where it is ?
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.7/435 - Release Date: 31/08/2006