I take this as a "Yes" then ?
Once an item is in the spoil heap, it is no longer of any importance
whatsoever, and can be discarded ?
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:06:22 +0100, Alan Radley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>I don't wish to labour the point, but :-
>We are saying that once an item (no matter what itís historical value may
>be) is in the spoil heap and has no accurate context, it should be left
>where it is ?