JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  August 2006

POETRYETC August 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Also worth considering

From:

Roger Day <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and poetics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:34:22 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (108 lines)

Hezbollah and  women's rights. Now I grant you that the wikipedia
isn't an immaculate source, but it's as good as, if not better than,
any shoddy polemic from a mouthpiece of that American citizen, Rupert
Murdoch.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah

<Quote>
Women's rights

In keeping with Lebanon's generally secular and egalitarian culture,
Hezbollah recognizes and promotes women's rights (in the mold of the
Western liberal tradition) somewhat more strongly than do other groups
associated with Islamic jihad, or for that matter than does Iran,
Hezbollah's self-proclaimed "model and example"[36] (see Women in
Muslim societies).[54]

One member of the Hezbollah Political Council, speaking to an Online
Journal correspondent in July 2006, claimed that "Hezbollah differs
from many Islamic groups in our treatment of women. We believe women
have the ability like men to participate in all parts of life."[54]
The Online Journal correspondent writes,

    From its founding in the 1980s, Hezbollah women have headed
education, medical and social service organizations. Most recently
Hezbollah nominated several women to run in the Lebanese elections. It
named Wafa Hoteit as a chief of Al Noor Radio (also recently bombed),
and promoted 37-year-old Rima Fakhry to its highest ruling body, the
Hezbollah Political Council. Part of Fakhry's duties include
interpreting Islamic feminism in Sharia law for the Committee for
Political Analysis.[54]

Hezbollah's inclination towards secular liberal values should not be
overstated, however. For example, its official stance on homosexuality
hews close to traditional religious teachings (see Gay rights in
Lebanon: Politics).
</Quote>

The fact that they call for the destruction of the State of Israel
isn't surprising given that they were formed as a reaction against
Israel's occupation of Lebanon in the 80s. Oh bloody days, lest we
forget, and it seems we have.

I see, too, the ghost of Hitler raised in this article. Pah!

What is worth considering is that the Americans have gone through the
UN process (Bolton has STFU), they've involved France in the Lebanon
peace-keeping force (oh, I thought they were cheese-eating surrender
monkeys? Bush, FFS, is even *rumoured to be reading Camus's
L'etranger?????!!!!), the right-wing shock-jobs have suddenly gone
silent about the end of days
(http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n16/klei01_.html). Is it because the
congressional elections are coming up soon? Perhaps the Israel-Lebanon
War suddenly played ill in the focus groups? All those pictures of
dead kids on the 9 o'clock news and it's *our side that's doing it ...
Is is it because the anti-war Lamont made a good showing?

Roger

On 8/16/06, Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Definitely, but who is the 'I' speaking here?
>
> I would agree with 'Part of it feels the wrong side is winning.' But
> also with most of the post Stephen forwarded. Israel (& the US behind
> it) may still understand something about tactics, but the strategy is
> failing mightily, & that's not good for Israel, for democracy ever
> coming to the rest of the mid_east, or for any lessening of the rabid
> fundamentalist Islamist/terrorists. So I'd have to agree that no one
> really won, but what 'we' in the West seem to see as terrorism got a
> big boost.
>
> Still, I'd also agree with this woman (I presume) that feminists
> supporting Hezbollah are making a big mistake (anyone supporting them
> is). But I do no t think that making some criticisms of Israel's
> policy, in this latest war, & in much else it has done, makes one an
> anti-Semite, so I hope they can move forward in order to begin to build
> a Mid-East in which Israel is accepted, & the countries around it are
> working (democracies of some kind) for all in them, not least the women
> accorded full citizenship (oh, around a century from now, at the rate
> things are going...).
>
> Doug
>
> On 16-Aug-06, at 4:22 AM, Frederick Pollack wrote:
>
> > Wimmin at War - Review - Times Online
> Douglas Barbour
> 11655 - 72 Avenue NW
> Edmonton  Ab  T6G 0B9
> (780) 436 3320
> http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
>
> Latest book: Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
> http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
>
> surely when they fell
> it was into grace
>
>         bpNichol
>


-- 
http://www.badstep.net/
http://www.cb1poetry.org.uk/
"From the waist downwards, Bloodnok was tattooed with a pair of false
legs... facing the wrong way."

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager