Yes, that'll be the one. Apologies. Still not entirely convinced. I just can't work out if it is 'serious' or not. I didn't realise Atkins were involved though. I guess it must be serious.
I can see the result being a slightly tongue-in-cheek 'site report' BUT I would love to be proved wrong.
Paul Barford <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Jim Dixon wrote:
> Perhaps a mission statement from Ms Newland
> would help to clear things up? The closest I can find is
> Bristol's press release.
Did you mean this?
I note that they say "this is only a draft version and may be changed as the
project progresses," hmmm.
There is a parallel discussion here
http://www.bajr.org/BAJRForum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=778 and the opinions are
very much divided.
Now you can scan emails quickly with a reading pane. Get the new Yahoo! Mail.