Now "hold on" I do not think that ANYBODY should be involved in the
pernicios industry of pornography and you so call liberals who support this
are nothing more than Capitalist lackeys more even than I aM
A principle is a principle and if there were no principles there would be no
kinds of rights in the first place.
Do what you will and regard that as the whole of the law if you will but
your will does not deny my right to decry you for that else you are
hypocritical.
Larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Disability-Research Discussion List
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Andrea Hollomotz
> Sent: 04 July 2006 17:07
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Social inclusion, not "freak shows" - Re: Re: sex ...
>
>
> Yes, I think we can make a separation here. Whatever anyone's
> views on pornography; to say disabled people should not be part
> of something "bad" or "exploitative" is to give them "special"
> status - and "special" is a label that we are challenging in all
> other areas of social life. So what is the difference with
> pornography? (Once again: I am not referring to sensationalist
> documentaries.)
> When we argue for social inclusion we cannot say: "Hold on, but
> do not take part in this particular aspect of social life,
> because it's 'bad'". What we are aiming for is a society within
> which disabled adults are free to choose to do whatever they
> please to do. I therefore have no objections to the idea of
> disabled porn actors, as long as they are not portrayed as different.
>
> Andrea
>
________________End of message______________________
This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies). Enquiries about the list administratione should be sent to [log in to unmask]
Archives and tools are located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
|