On tor, 2006-07-13 at 18:15 +0100, Pete Johnston wrote:
> > Furthermore, if I want to express that some valueURI is to be
> > interpreted according to a particular encoding scheme, like
> > dcx:valueURI="http://example.org/standards/DDC/500"
> > dcx:vocabEncSchemeURI="http://purl.org/dc/terms/DDC"
> > I end up with two attributes, one referring to the other.
> > This can become quite ambiguous. Or is this ruled out and
> > supposed to be encoded (somehow?) in the valueURI?
> I don't see any ambiguity here ;-)
Well, there would be if multiple value URIs were allowed. Now, since
only a single value URI and vocabulary encoding scheme is allowed per
statement, no ambiguity is possible.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose