JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Archives


CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES Home

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES  June 2006

CONTAMINATED-LAND-STRATEGIES June 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Compensation for Land Potentially Affected by Landfill Gas

From:

"Ivens, Rob" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Ivens, Rob

Date:

Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:09:57 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

I would agree re point 5.

if low gas levels are being monitored then the risk can be overcome. a good membrane properly QA'd even use a radiological tracer if your really concerened.... and you could have a nice safe development.

Has this been considered.

ps we have 20 houses sandwiched between two landfill and we signed it off with 30% methan @2 m proximity and probably going under the properties... if that helps.

So much to read.
So Little Time

Rob Ivens MVDC- 01306 879232 

-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Lang,
Henry E
Sent: 01 June 2006 11:53
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Compensation for Land Potentially Affected by Landfill Gas


David at Selby and Steve

I came across this as an issue years ago with regards to a series of old landfills in Leicester, plus others in Thurrock, Medway Towns, Maidstone etc:
1/ The issue of Nuisance as covered by Rylands v Fletcher can be made to apply and the claim would probably succeed unless you can demonstrate that you have undertaken works to adequately prevent off-site migration onto the neighbours property, or that the gas in no way effects their 'enjoyment' of the property. If it is stopping them develop due to blight, you will probably lose the argument;
2/ Time to call in Valerie Fogleman of Lovells. She is well versed with gas issues as that was the basis of the [sadly deceased] Sevenoaks Case where we had 60%+ CH4 under some houses;
3/ Steve is correct that the issue will snowball as the adjoining residents will get involved. If there is an existing migration issue it will need to be Risk Assessed before the local press start to run the usual 'Time Bomb' headlines;
4/ The new gas guidance is due out in a couple of months, but don't wait for it.
5/ Finally, the proximity of the landfill to the development site need not be any constraint to safe built development. It just needs to incorporate appropriate building protection measures and good CQA etc. There are plenty of examples where this has been achieved successfully. It is building ON the landfill that still tends to cause problems through settlement etc.

If you need pointing at a list of Lawyers with relevant knowledge, drop me a line. I can't, of course, recommend any, but certainly know a few with relevant experience at both Solicitor and Barrister level.

Good luck

Henry Lang


Henry E Lang
Director - Land Quality
Waterman Environmental
Tel 0207 928 7888
Mob 07796 990667
email  [log in to unmask]
Kirkaldy House, 99 Southwark Street, London, SE1 0JF

-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve
Sent: 01 June 2006 10:02
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Compensation for Land Potentially Affected by Landfill Gas

David

Given the sum of money involved I'd strongly recommend your Council get a
little specialist legal advice before making any decisions - there are two
or three individuals whose names spring to mind.

The only other things I would add are:

i) You are both advising the Local Authority in how to protect its interests
and advising the Local Planning Authority in what degree of gas protection
would be required to safely develop - which is a clear conflict. This is a
fairly common situation from my experience, but it does need some careful
consideration and you need to ensure there are the appropriate checks and
balances in place and that everything is well documented, including clear
records relating to all your decisions.

ii) CIRIA are in the final stages of issuing some new guidance on landfill
gas that might have a bearing on the actual measures, and therefore sum,
required for any development.

iii) Ultimately if it does end up in court the proposed development will
suffer a degree of blight, other residents around the site (or other such
sites) are likely to be concerned and possibly seek similar
compensation/measures, and a lot of cash will be spent on consultants and
lawyers and I suspect this case will be all you spend your time on for the
next 12 months! Very important to get good advice at the start.


Hope this helps.


Steve Moreby




-----Original Message-----
From: Contaminated Land Management Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of david
jackson
Sent: 01 June 2006 09:29
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Compensation for Land Potentially Affected by Landfill Gas


Dear List Members,
I have a former landfill that is surrounded in the main with residential
housing. Tipping of the former clay pits occurred between the 1960's to
around 1974 and was believed to be predominantly domestic waste. Monitoring
in some of the older properties that have no gas protection measures has
been undertaken for 10 years with nothing of note being found. Still above
action levels of CO2 and CH4 within the fill zone and potentially just off
site.
The problem I have is that a developer has bought a piece of vacant land
next to the landfill which they are looking to redevelop into residential
housing. After many years of debate between us and the developer they have
finally thrown the dummy out and are threatening to take the Council to
court over trespassing rights (I think the angle here is the Rylands vs.
Fletcher case). Up until now I didn't think they had a leg to stand on under
Part IIA and Planning law but our solicitor now thinks they may have a
legitimate case under trespassing laws for compensation for any necessary
remedial measures in the proposed dwellings plus other related damages.
Apparently if successful could be potentially £0.5 Million if we were to
lose the case.
Our view is that we should be prepared to go through the courts but we are
mindful of the repercussions, both at this Authority and across the UK as
well, should we lose as many instances of such land exist. Dependant on
whether we decide to take this case on and indeed if they instigate
proceeding at all, I may consider drumming up support from other LA's to
maybe attempt some united front.
If anybody has any experience in such a matter or has any comments I would
be pleased to here from you.
Regards
David Jackson
Contaminated Land Officer
Environmental Services
Selby District Council
Tel: (01757) 292293
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.2/349 - Release Date: 26/05/2006

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.2/349 - Release Date: 26/05/2006


 
The contents of this e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Any views stated herein do not necessarily represent the view of the company and are those of the individual sender, except where it specifically states them to be the views of the Company.

No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mis-transmission. If you have received this e-mail in error please delete it and all copies and e-mail a notification to the sender. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may constitute a breach of confidence.

All reasonable precautions have been taken to see that no viruses are present in this e-mail. Waterman Group cannot accept liability for loss, disruption or damage however caused, arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments and recommend that you subject these to virus checking procedures prior to use.

E-mail messages may be monitored and by replying to this message the recipient gives their consent to such monitoring. 

c 2006 Waterman Group plc


________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
November 1999
July 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager