On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 01:34:21PM +0100, Steve Traylen wrote:
> Checking through the output it looks okay other than possibly lowering
> the case of the attributes which may in fact be okay as far as ldif is
> concerned but I expect something will blow up somewhere. But I know
> you said it was alpha version. Looking through it it looks like you have
> lowered the case on purpose?
Since ldif attributes are case insensitive there is little point to
complicate the data structures to store the original value (easilly
done though). In my opinion if any grid tool depends on the case of
ldap attributes it is horribly broken and should be fixed.
On a different note in the original script if an attribute doesn't
appear in the static list the dynamic value is ignored is this the
"right" behaviour? I would have thought that missing values in the
dynamic value are substituted by the static ones. Does anyone have
an idea on what the correct way to handle this is?
Kostas
|