The document looks good to me. I have no personal opinions on the change
itself.
One thing: maybe there should be a note regarding the DCMITYPE
namespace?
/Mikael
fre 2006-04-07 klockan 10:25 +0100 skrev Andy Powell:
> One of the issues that was discussed briefly at and around the f2f
> meeting in Madrid was whether we should consider replicating the current
> 15 DCMES properties (i.e. the 15 terms in the DC namespace) in the
> DCTERMS namespace. The intention being to simplify the deployment of DC
> metadata by requiring only a single namespace for all the properties.
>
> This issue is now on the agenda of the next DC Usage Board meeting in
> Seattle in a couple of weeks time. A discussion paper outlining the
> pros and cons of making this change is available at
>
> http://dublincore.org/usageboardwiki/ReplicatingDCMESINDCTERMS
>
> This paper will form the basis of our discussion. We would therefore
> welcome any views that people on this list have, either about the
> discussion paper or about the change itself.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
> --
> Head of Development, Eduserv Foundation
> http://www.eduserv.org.uk/foundation/
> [log in to unmask]
> +44 (0)1225 474319
>
--
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
|