fre 2006-04-21 klockan 17:55 +0100 skrev Pete Johnston:
>
> Sorry to leap back to this topic, but the issue came up in the course of
> my thinking about something else...
>
> Currently we have the class "Literal" as the range of the title,
> abstract, alternative, and tableOfContents properties.
>
> But in the work on the LOM-DCAM mapping over in the DC-IEEE-TaskForce
> [1], we've suggested using the dc:title property with a value which is
> an instance of a class we called "Natural Language String", i.e. a
> resource which may be represented by multiple value strings, each
> associated with different language tags (corresponding to the LangString
> datatype in LOM).
>
> I think (but I'm not completely sure) that this would require the range
> for dc:title to be something other than the class of Literals.
I agree. I can't say I'm 100% against having Literal as range of those
properties, although we should be very clear about the fact that
multiple language strings for the same value would not be supported in
this case (and thus the LOM DCAM work would be affected).
Most important is a clear definition.
/Mikael
>
> Pete
>
> [1]
> http://dublincore.org/educationwiki/DCMIIEEELTSCTaskforce/LomDCAMAnalysis
>
--
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
|