I concur with m'learned colleague who is indeed quite accurate in his
statement.
I would, however, emphasise his final qualification starting "If you
want to impress..."
--
Les
On 15 Mar 2006, at 11:00, C.Oppenheim wrote:
> I don't agree with Les.
>
> Panels are instructed to consider *any* sort of published output,
> and this would consider something that had only ever appeared on an
> IR, or on a web page; indeed, statistics from the last RAE show
> that a small proportion of the items examined by the panels were in
> web page form only. However, if you want to impress the RAE panel,
> the item should have been through a proper refereeing process.
>
> Charles
>
> Professor Charles Oppenheim
> Department of Information Science
> Loughborough University
> Loughborough
> Leics LE11 3TU
>
> Tel 01509-223065
> Fax 01509-223053
> e mail [log in to unmask]
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Leslie Carr" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 10:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Generic Rationale and Model for University Open Access
> Mandate
>
>
>> Whether articles are disseminated by an institutional repository
>> is irrelevant to RAE assessment.
>>
>> It is whether they have been published by a journal (or conference
>> or whatever the assessment panel uses as a criterion) that matters.
>>
>> In other words, appearing in an IR does not make an article
>> "published" in the eyes of the RAE.
>> --
>> Les Carr
>>
>> On 15 Mar 2006, at 09:50, Wolfgang Greller wrote:
>>
>>> Can anyone tell me whether articles published in an institutional
>>> e- print repository count as publication in UK RAE terms?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Wolfgang
>>>
>>> Dr Wolfgang Greller
>>> Head of e-Learning
>>> University of Klagenfurt
>>> Austria
|