On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 01:54:39PM +0100, Pete Johnston wrote:
> Mikael Nilsson wrote:
> >I strongly believe that the "definitive" machine-readable Schema Model
> >should be based on RDFS, as they are. We win nothing by generalizing
> >this any further.
>
> That's fine with me.
To be clear: I was not suggesting that anything be done
apart from RDFS from a modeling perspective. I was merely
suggesting that somewhere, documention should be provided on
the set of properties used to describe DCMI terms (a Schema
Profile as much as a Schema Model).
Tom
--
Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask]
Director, Specifications and Documentation
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative
|