Wile the CA rpms are topical, please could you keep up the pressure to get
these and other LCG RPMs signed?
Cheers,
Simon
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Coles, J (Jeremy) wrote:
> Dear All
>
> Please take note of this CA rpm update. I believe many sites are already
> failing the SFT test due to this even though we have only just been
> informed of the update!
>
> Many thanks,
> Jeremy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EGEE BROADCAST [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 28 February 2006 15:48
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: New CA rpms (based on IGTF 1.1 R2)
>
> -----------------------------------------------
> Publication from : Oliver Keeble 9443 <[log in to unmask]> (CERN)
> This mail has been sent using the broadcasting tool available at
> http://cic.in2p3.fr
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> EUGridPMA have announced a new set of CA rpms (v1.1R2).
>
> https://www.eugridpma.org/distribution/current/CHANGES
>
> Please upgrade as soon as you can. See the following page for more
> details
>
> http://grid-deployment.web.cern.ch/grid-deployment/lcg2CAlist.html
>
> In addition, please note that sites are discouraged from updating CA
> rpms
> directly from the EUGridPMA repository. The EUGridPMA repository should
> not be
> regarded as an operational service. Such an assumption may also result
> in an
> overload of the repository server.
>
> Site Functional Tests have been updated.
>
|