> at least linked spectra). My second thought was that it would be OK to
> read the assignments into the same Shiftlist as the working assignment
> because (at this stage at least) we are playing with data that have no
> residue specific assignments yet (this would not be ideal where you were
> comparing a partially made assignment with the output of an automatic
> assignment program) - but the import function seems to always want to put
> the assignment into a separate shift list. Currently a bit stumped.
The Analysis option Assignment::Confirm Seq Spin Systems is built with
this sort of thing in mind. The idea here is that the predicted sequential
connections for any given unassigned residue/spin system can be expressed
as sequential links to fairly empty spin systems (e.g. just to an "i-1" Ca
resonance), without using the backbone/root spin systems at all.
With the backbone/root spin systems displayed in their predicted
sequential order, the user can then merge the small linking "i-1" spin
system to the appropriate backbone/root spin systems if the match is
deemed to be good.
T.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Tim Stevens Email: [log in to unmask]
Department of Biochemistry [log in to unmask]
University of Cambridge Phone: +44 1223 766022 (office)
80 Tennis Court Road +44 7816 338275 (mobile)
Old Addenbrooke's Site +44 1223 364613 (home)
Cambridge CB2 1GA WWWeb: http://www.bio.cam.ac.uk/~tjs23
United Kingdom http://www.pantonia.co.uk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ +NH3CH(CH(CH3)OH)C(O)NHCH(CH(CH3)CH2CH3)C(O)NHCH(CH2CH2SCH3)CO2- -------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|