Dear Wayne,
It would be nice to have it like in Sparky. An arrow pointing to the
crosspeak cross ('X') and the ability to have the labels all around
the peak with an arrow or triangle per label. Why not having the
default like it is now, as I find it useful too when assigning
overlapping peaks to have a visual clue of the deviation, but add an
facility to drag the labels anywhere around the peak which will cause
an 'arrow + label' to be drawn in the style of Sparky. Would this
manual creation of offset need an algorithm too or would it be simpler?
I would also like to take this chance to request the ability to click
and remove individual markers and rulers. It would be nice to have
them in a few colours also, if possible.
Many thanks.
Best,
Murali.
On 13 Jan 2006, at 10:50 am, Wayne Boucher wrote:
> Definitely not an easy one! The current implementation is the
> simplest
> one imaginable, where every peak just draws itself with a fixed
> offset.
> To do better you'd have to consider the peaks all together and
> define the
> offsets all separately, using some algorithm. That could be done
> (although if the spectrum is too crowded I doubt it would be perfect).
>
> Wayne
>
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Christoph Rademacher wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> may be this is a quiet easy one: is it possible to set the peak draw
>> parameter to avoid overlap of the labels while maintaining all
>> information? When I print crowded regions of my spectra I can not
>> read
>> the labels.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Christoph
>>
|