On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Brad Cavanagh wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Peter W. Draper wrote:
>
>>> I suppose so. I was trying to wrap my head around ACSIS FITS headers, so I
>>> suppose this would be a diversion of some kind.
>>
>> Don't see the updates, so I guess the headers won. I've made the changes
>> and committed them, so keep at it!
>
> After I spent an hour looking at it, getting more and more depressed by the
> lack of proper Starlink prologue comments in some of the relevant PHOTOM
> files, I passed it over to Tim. :-)
Parts of PHOTOM are venerable indeed, and go back so far that standard
prologues and the like were still being discussed (either that or Nick
Eaton got away with it, Rodney used to actually look at submitted code
back then and pass comments!).
|