JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for JISC-REPOSITORIES Archives


JISC-REPOSITORIES Archives

JISC-REPOSITORIES Archives


JISC-REPOSITORIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

JISC-REPOSITORIES Home

JISC-REPOSITORIES Home

JISC-REPOSITORIES  January 2006

JISC-REPOSITORIES January 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?

From:

Howard Noble <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Howard Noble <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:54:48 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (130 lines)

Hello, like the postings on this subject.

How about: a repository is an integrated set of software components that
provide discrete services, examples of which are:
  a.. 2.1 Alert
  b.. 2.2 Archiving
  c.. 2.3 Authentication
  d.. 2.4 Authorisation
  e.. 2.5 Content management
  f.. 2.6 DRM
  g.. 2.7 Federated search
  h.. 2.8 Filing
  i.. 2.9 Group
  j.. 2.10 Harvesting
  k.. 2.11 Identifier
  l.. 2.12 Member
  m.. 2.13 Metadata management
  n.. 2.14 Packaging
  o.. 2.15 Person
  p.. 2.16 Rating/ annotation
  q.. 2.17 Resolver
  r.. 2.18 Role
  s.. 2.19 Search
  t.. 2.20 Service registry
  u.. 2.21 Workflow
  v.. 2.22 Accounting
  w.. 2.23 Version control



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Arthur Sale" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:04 AM
Subject: Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?


> What's wrong with the well-established and well-understood term 'database'
> for the underlying layer? 30yo. Isn't it sexy enough?
>
> Arthur
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Repositories discussion list
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> > Behalf Of Richard Green
> > Sent: Wednesday, 18 January 2006 01:19
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: Institutional Repositories: do they need a new name?
> >
> > ...or might the term 'repository' better have been applied to the
> underlying
> > layer where digital objects are stored and managed together with the
basic
> > services common to the majority of peoples' needs?  Additional
> functionality
> > to manage the specific needs of theses, for example, is then at a level
> > somewhat above this; beside that the extra functionality appropriate to
an
> > image collection, beside that... and so on. If the repository layer is
> > flexible enough, it should be able to support many different types of
> > object.  Unfortunately 'repository' is now used in many (often
> conflicting)
> > ways!  Maybe we need to coin a new term for the underlying layer?
> >
> > Richard Green
> > Manager, RepoMMan Project
> > e-SIG, Academic Services
> > University of Hull
> >
> > [log in to unmask]
> > www.hull.ac.uk/esig/repomman
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Repositories discussion list
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > On Behalf Of Matthew J. Dovey
> > Sent: 17 January 2006 13:40
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [JISC-REPOSITORIES] Institutional Repositories: do they
need
> a
> > new name?
> >
> >
> > > The subject header on this email was intended to be
> > > provocative so that
> > > everyone would read this email!
> >
> > However, this is a very good point. At Oxford when we convened a group
of
> > relevant parties (from libraries, archives, museums, e-learning,
e-science
> > etc.) to discuss an Institutional Repository, we had as many (if not
more)
> > definitions of "repository" than people around the table.
> >
> > I think the only common theme is that a "repository" is defined as much
by
> > its use as by its contents e.g. an e-learning repository primary
objective
> > is typically re-use rather than preservation; an archival repository on
> the
> > other hand is often more focused on long term preservation than allowing
> the
> > use of the data (indeed may not necessarily have any delivery
component);
> an
> > experimental data repository might be focused on enabling validation of
> > experiments; a pre-prints archive on pre-publication peer review
resulting
> > in improvements to the published article; a post-publication repository
in
> > preserving the article etc. (and this list is by no means exhaustive).
> >
> > I think a pertinent question is whether there is enough commonality
> between
> > all the things which have picked up the "repository" nomenclature to
> justify
> > attempting to view these as aspects of the same thing, or as completely
> > different things with similar names!
> >
> > Matthew Dovey
> > Oxford University
>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager