JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for JISC-REPOSITORIES Archives


JISC-REPOSITORIES Archives

JISC-REPOSITORIES Archives


JISC-REPOSITORIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

JISC-REPOSITORIES Home

JISC-REPOSITORIES Home

JISC-REPOSITORIES  January 2006

JISC-REPOSITORIES January 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Institutional Repositories: Stemming the needless flow

From:

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:36:20 +0000

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (71 lines)

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Melanie Bates wrote:

> The Learning Technology world discovers the Digital Library world and  
> it makes an enormous discovery.  That the librarians are storing,  
> cataloguing and managing research content in one place using FREE  
> software.  Not only is this software FREE but it is being adopted by  
> almost simultaneously by many Institutions in the UK and around the  
> world - hey even Google are doing it, ... it must be the next big  
> thing!  And so the 'Institutional Repository' is born.

If anyone is interested in the history, provenance and motivation of
all this free software, hence of the "IR" movement itself, they will
find it here:

    http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october00/10inbrief.html#HARNAD
    http://www.arl.org/sparc/pubs/enews/aug01.html#6

This is not by way of touting Southampton's causal role, but by way of
suggesting that the fact that OA and OAI were the source of IRs might
just have something to do with what IRs should be used for (as a matter
of first and urgent priority).

It is not that storing and preserving every digitised object under
the sun is not a good idea. It is just a question of priorities. For
universities and research institutions, the immediate priority is this:
Scholarly and scientific research usage and impact have been needlessly
lost, cumulatively, since paper publication first began, because paper
costs and distribution necessarily meant that many would-be users could
not afford to access and use most research output. This has always meant
a great loss of potential research impact and progress to researchers,
their institutions, and to research itself.

    http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html

Ever since the creation of the Internet, however, with FTP, the Web, and
now OAI-compliant OA IR software and IRs, this annual research-impact
bleed can in fact be stanched. Yet the bleed is still being stanched
spontaneously for only about 15% of the planet's annual research output
today; 85% of it is still being lost, daily, and cumulatively. This
continuing bleed is hence a needless loss to the planet's research
institutions, the primary consumers of research findings, whose daily
bread (pardon the messy, mixed metaphor!) is research impact and progress
(and funding), as well as to the planet's teaching/learning institutions,
the secondary consumers of research knowledge and progess, and of course
each nation's tax-payers, the tertiary consumers of research applications
and benefits, who also happen to be the funders of much of the research.

So, to repeat, whereas there is no doubt a worthy and worthwhile agenda
to be pursued in ensuring the long-term storage and preservation of all
institutional digital output (and input), there is still some acute and
chronic bleeding to be stanched (85%) as a matter of urgent priority.

Until the digital era, the intrinsic limitations of paper itself were the
cause of the unstoppable hemorrhaging of daily research usage, impact
and progress. Please let us not now make diffuse digital conservationism
(a worthy and worthwhile pursuit) into its digital-era cause, through
neglect or distraction. Let us stanch the bleeding immediately, as a
matter of priority, and then get on with the generic digital preservation
agenda.

Stevan Harnad
American Scientist Open Access Forum
http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/American-Scientist-Open-Access-Forum.html

Professor of Cognitive Science    
Department of Electronics and Computer Science     
University of Southampton         
Highfield, Southampton
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
November 2005
October 2005


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager