-definition. It is entirely mine.
-'viewer': The viewer is not 'ignorant'. As any person who is born in an
episteme, and we all are; we live inside an hegemonic discourse which is
retransmitted and recreated all the time. The viewer is just more exposed
-the 'dis-abled': is a constructed category. I do not make much of the
category, we are all impaired in some way a or another, even the so called
abled/'normal'. The persons who can gain some status of 'authorised
interlocutor', whether this is circumstantial or not, should use it for
emancipatory purpose, if one is 'aware' of the normalising powers of the
episteme. disabled people in opulent societies are given some space for
this. Other oppressed categories in the world are not given that
possibility/luxury. Foucault implied that this is a power of resistance. O
course you could also go 'happy go larry'- no relation to our famous member-
and say 'what you have been constructed to think' ('the mighty truth'). And
be 'famous' for being in the show/circus.
-pros cons: pros: be aware that the truth has always been a political battle
of discourses.The liberal say: truth will set you free' but this is a half
truth. Truth will make you enter into another circle of hegemonic dominance.
Epistemologically, the enlightenment does not have a project. Cons: would
never be able to believe in anyone, not even your mates in the labour or
communist party. Which I gather some will say it is good not to trust them
-sex effect: I gather weather the curiosity of the viewer via ITV, it is its
Aquiles heel. It gives you a chance. The episteme incapacity for oversee
and control everything. This 'big brother' has been able to dissect the
body, and now has a voyeuristic anger.The resistant warrior will give them a
window but not for free, The 'agent' would be able to send two or three
messages of resistance in between. That is the importance of the 'right'
person. Who is she/he? Don't know. Could be anyone. Even the most prepared
may not be. The message not necessary depends on the agent but sometimes on
the context and the circumstance. This is a mystery to me. Hence, the
importance of being at the right time and the right moment.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carol Hamilton" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: documentary and relevant people
> >Hi Andy Pity I can't cut across to your part of the world and have a
> >discussion... If I could I would be asking where your definition of
> >relevant people and disabled academics and activists parted company.
> >Also it would be good to hear your thoughts about the idea that, in
> >addition to putting the right message across to the (ignorant)
> >average viewer, time could also usefully be spent in critiquing what
> >this label might mean to both the disabled and abled, and the pros
> >and cons of viewing people in this way.
> And yes a tape recorder was the death of a good interview about
> sexuality issues. Many of the interviews did end up being a matter of
> 'discourse adjustment for the right time and the right place' rather
> than frank and open discussion, and there wasn't much I could do
> about it most of the time. I spent a long time berating myself that I
> could have been a 'better' interviewer, and perhaps I could have.
> However that position underestimates the 'especially dense transfer
> of power/knowledge effects' (Foucault) that the term sexuality
> creates, not the least effect of which is to silence many people's
> voices, abled and disabled.
> cheers Carol
> >Carol. I gather yours is a different kind point, I agree. For 'Relevant'
> >people, I meant people that can realise when they are manipulated and
> >so they can adjust their discourse at the right time in the right
> >manner.Post industrial societies life in circus of appearances, you may
> >an small chance to open up a little hole from which a different world and
> >discourses could be legitimised and enabled to resist and oppose the
> >on your point about sex. Sex has always been repressed in post Victorian
> >societies as part of the disciplinarian technologies of the body and the
> >body politics. Research on this issue will have to be in settings were
> >subject and the observer built a space of trust. I doubt you will enter
> >that space with a tape recorder.
> >So back to your point, you indeed are underestimating the power of
> >reflection of the media savvy audience. Plenty of research will confirm
> >the repetition of messages are stored in long term memories and the
> >construction of 'culture' in the 'average viewer' (this is 25 hrs per
> >Cheers, Andy
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Carol Hamilton" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <>
> >Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 8:29 PM
> >Subject: Re: documentary and relevant people
> >> Just a thought about relevant people, where it could be assumed that
> >> this might involve members of the disability academic and activist
> >> community. One of the things my research into barriers (!) to
> >> sexuality support for intellectually disabled people has turned up
> >> might be useful.
> >> When I was trying to find out what has been written in this country
> >> about disabled sexuality and sexuality support up until now, I went
> >> to the NZJDS, the most influential local disability related journal
> >> that includes both academic and activist writing. This journal has
> >> been published since 1993. 58 feature articles, 7 interviews, 4
> >> innovative service initiative pieces and 28 book reviews later I
> >> found practically nothing on the topic of disabled sexuality. Two
> >> articles gave one mention and that was it. Nothing about support,
> >> nothing about young people, nothing about older people and nothing
> >> about men's sexuality.
> >> So, back to these relevant, experiences and versed in emancipatory
> >> issues personnel..... or perhaps I am trying to make another kind of
> >> point. It is a bit worrying when talk is taken, misused or
> >> prescribed. I've had my share of this happening. Yet perhaps we are
> >> *all* a bit more media savvy as viewers nowadays. Perhaps I am
> >> suggesting that we might be underestimating the ability of the
> >> average viewer not to realise they are being fed a line or two if
> >> that is what is happening.
> >> Another difficulty I have experienced doing my research was trying to
> > > break through the 'official' cordon that seems to have been put
> >> around support workers talk in the area of sexuality support. The
> >> interviews I undertook were very difficult, especially when workers
> >> seemed reluctant to talk. Interestingly, 'official' covers almost
> >> everyone in society when you really think about it. ie it is not just
> >> human service personnel who are reluctant to talk about sexuality
> >> issues, let alone disabled sexuality issues.
> >> Cheers Carol
> >> >I agree with the word caution. However, I would suggest that this
> >> >should not be read as 'no participation'. The relevant people
> >> >experienced and versed in emancipatory issues) should put across
> >> >so to try to use the space offered. Ch 4 offers a high rated viewer a
> >> >programme. We could place one or two messages of resistance. Andy
> >> >----- Original Message -----
> >> >From: "Larry Arnold" <[log in to unmask]>
> >> >To: <>
> >> >Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 11:20 PM
> >> >Subject: Re: documentary
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > > More or less what I was saying, now some time back I contacted
> >> > >
> >> ________________End of message______________________
> >> This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for
> >Disability Studies at the University of Leeds
> >(www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies). Enquiries about the list
> >administratione should be sent to
[log in to unmask]
> >> Archives and tools are located at:
> >> www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
> >> You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
> ________________End of message______________________
> This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for
Disability Studies at the University of Leeds
(www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies). Enquiries about the list
administratione should be sent to [log in to unmask]
> Archives and tools are located at:
> You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.
________________End of message______________________
This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies). Enquiries about the list administratione should be sent to [log in to unmask]
Archives and tools are located at:
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.