JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CETIS-METADATA Archives


CETIS-METADATA Archives

CETIS-METADATA Archives


CETIS-METADATA@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CETIS-METADATA Home

CETIS-METADATA Home

CETIS-METADATA  January 2006

CETIS-METADATA January 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Describing resources using metadata

From:

Lorna Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Lorna Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:33:35 +0000

Content-Type:

multipart/mixed

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (149 lines) , Lorna Campbell.vcf (16 lines) , Unknown Name (4 lines)

Hi Deborah,

I'd have responded to your post sooner but I'm in the process of 
completing a long overdue paper for the Digital Curation Centre on this 
very topic! :-}

As Fred suggested, if you are looking for a metadata schema designed to 
describe teaching and learning resources then the best place to start 
is with the UK LOM Core.  The UK LOM Core is an application of the IEEE 
Learning Object Metadata Standard designed to meet the specific 
requirements of the UK educational community. The profile has been 
developed by CETIS and is supported by UKOLN, Becta and Learning and 
Teaching Scotland.

As Fred noted, the UK LOM Core currently exists in draft format, 
however we hope to progress it to a final version sometime this year.  
If you are interested in implementing the UK LOM Core then I suggest 
you use the working draft UK LOM Core 0.3_1204 which you can download 
from http://www.cetis.ac.uk/profiles/uklomcore/wip/

The profile itself consists of two components:

1) A minimum required Core Element Set which has been designed to 
facilitate basic interoperability.  Most implementers tend add extra 
LOM elements to this Core Element Set as it accommodates only the most 
basic information.  You'll be glad to hear that the Core Element Set 
consists of 18 simple data elements, as opposed to 60 which is closer 
to the number of elements in the LOM standard as a whole :-} Of these 
18 simple data elements approximately half of them (identifiers, dates, 
etc) should  be automatically generated and half need to be authored by 
hand.

2) Implementation Guidelines and Element Requirements - guidelines are 
provided on implementing every single element in the IEEE LOM Standard 
to try ensure that they are used with some consistency across the UK.  
Many of these guidelines are lifted directly from the Can Core 
Guidelines that Fred mentioned but some are tailored specifically to 
the UK sector.

Hope this helps, if you need any further information regarding the UK 
LOM Core or metadata in general, please don't hesitate to ask.

Best Wishes
Lorna

PS. Apologies for the broken link to the Metadata FAQ, I reported this 
last week and our horribly overworked techies are on the case :-}


On 24 Jan 2006, at 15:57, Fred Riley wrote:

> Deborah
>
> We don't have a repository up and running as yet, although I'm 
> currently developing a small-scale local LO database, but we've been 
> planning and thinking about this on and off for some time. The default 
> metadata schema for learning objects appears to be the UK LOM Core 
> (http://www.cetis.ac.uk/profiles/uklomcore), still at version 0.2 but 
> being worked on feverishly going by the occasional eruptions of 
> activity on this list. It's the schema being used by JORUM 
> (www.jorum.ac.uk). The spec document is a bit dry and aimed at 
> professional cataloguers from what I can see, but as the LOM is, I 
> believe, closely descended from CanCore you could use some of the 
> user-friendly guidelines on that site 
> (http://www.cancore.ca/en/guidelines.html). The Higher Education 
> Academy (nee LTSN) uses an application profile of CanCore/UK LOM 
> Core/IEEE LOM (I don't know which) called RLLOMAP and there are 
> user-friendly cataloguing guidelines online at 
> http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/interoperability.htm
>
> Of course you don't have to go for a LOM to tag your objects - you 
> could stick to a simple schema such as Dublin Core, but the trouble 
> with that is that DC doesn't have any fields describing educational 
> data.
>
> I would suggest looking at the educational metadata FAQ at CETIS 
> (http://www.cetis.ac.uk/metadatafaq/FrontPage)  but the link is kaput, 
> so perhaps one of the CETIS folk on here could have a look at it?
>
> As for developing a repository from scratch, that could be a Herculean 
> task if you're going to make it compliant with a LOM. It's something I 
> did think about, but knocked on the head after I saw the 60-odd fields 
> in the UK LOM Core. It might be better, if you've got the money, to 
> get server-based software such as the ubiquitous Intralibrary which 
> costs 5 figures but can, so I've heard, do anything that you might 
> want to do with a LO repository. The CETL I'm involved in 
> (www.rlo-cetl.ac.uk) will likely be getting a copy of Intralibrary to 
> host and tag its outputs.
>
>> From what I've read and heard, I think you've more chance of getting 
>> hamsters to roll boulders than of getting academics to input detailed 
>> metadata, a job which, IMO, is best left to professional cataloguers 
>> and librarians for a whole bunch of reasons, not least time and 
>> quality of metadata. This is certainly the approach that JORUM is 
>> taking, engaging piecework cataloguers to tag LOs as they're 
>> deposited - contact the JORUM folk for more details.
>
> Cheers
>
> Fred
>
> Fred Riley
> Learning Technologist
> Room C57, School of Nursing
> University of Nottingham
> Queen's Medical Centre
> Nottingham NG7 2HA
>
> Tel: +44 (0)115 82 30935
> http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/nursing/staff/support-staff/fred_riley.html
>
>>>> Deborah Ann Pratt <[log in to unmask]> 23/01/2006 16:19:02 >>>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am involved with developing an online repository of learning objects
> for use in the Business and Management subject area as part of a HEFCE
> (Higher Education Funding Council for England) funded project. We are
> currently at the development stage and as part of the repository there
> will be metadata on the materials. I have been searching the literature
> regarding metadata - can someone point me in the right direction as to
> the metadata guidelines that we could use. What have others used? We
> would like if possible - to keep the metadata relatively simple as
> academics will be responsible for completing this.
>
> I would welcome any comments.
>
> Deborah.
>
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an 
> attachment
> may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer 
> system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with 
> the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK 
> legislation.
>
>

--
Lorna M. Campbell
Assistant Director, CETIS
University of Strathclyde
+44 (0)141 548 3072
http://www.cetis.ac.uk/




Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
October 2022
August 2022
July 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022
November 2021
September 2021
May 2021
April 2021
February 2021
November 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
April 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
September 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager