JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-E-RESOURCES Archives


LIS-E-RESOURCES Archives

LIS-E-RESOURCES Archives


LIS-E-RESOURCES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-E-RESOURCES Home

LIS-E-RESOURCES Home

LIS-E-RESOURCES  2006

LIS-E-RESOURCES 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Gracing Periods for Electronic Journals - the need for an international standard - is it a month, two months, three months or none at all!

From:

Lesley Crawshaw <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

An informal open list set up by the UK Serials Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:23:28 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (209 lines)

Hi John,

Your email prompted me to go and have a quick look at the subscriptions I
administer function (I do use this and luckily the administration is
centralised here at the University of Hertfordshire).

One thing that has come out of looking at the list is that there are a
couple of publishers who are looking ahead and have already applied a 3
month gracing period to our 2006 subscriptions i.e. PNAS and JAMA, which I
think is good practice that all Highwire publisher should think of adopting.
It surely makes administrative sense to put the gracing in as each
subscription is renewed, otherwise don't the publishers who haven't done so,
have to repeat the job again in December unnecessarily?

Another thing that is clear is that even on Highwire different publishers
are adopting different gracing periods. The following only reflect titles of
ours that are still on a gracing period (and where there is an expiry date
displaying) e.g. The American Physiological Society and MIT Press have a 2
month gracing period, whereas ASPEN and Blackwell only have a 1 month
gracing period.

As you say some publishers do not provide expiry dates and this is
unfortunate especially as we have "big deals" with both OUP and SAGE. These
are also publishers where we have never rec'd expiration notices even though
there have occasionally been problems with our "real" subscriptions with
these publishers. So I am slightly at a loss as to whether I can use the
Highwire alerting system with these titles on Highwire?

Another comment is that we appear to be accumulating multiple subscriber
numbers for many of our OUP titles - I don't have time to look at them all,
but we now have 4 subscriber numbers for the British Journal of Criminology
all of which appear to be active. This multiplication of subscriber numbers
makes looking through the listing much more time consuming that it should
be. Presumably some of this is being caused by the fact that some of these
are our "real" subscriptions, but that they also come as part of a "big
deal" which maybe get given new subscriber numbers year on year?


Cheers
Lesley

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lesley Crawshaw, Faculty Information Consultant
Learning and Information Services
University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
email: [log in to unmask]
phone: 01707 284662 fax: 01707 284666
list owner: [log in to unmask]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-----Original Message-----
From: An informal open list set up by the UK Serials Group
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of John Sack
Sent: 26 January 2006 14:19
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Gracing Periods for Electronic Journals - the need for an
international standard - is it a month, two months, three months or none at
all!

Lesley,

I can, I think, provide you with one additional check for expiration within
the set of publishers working with Stanford's HighWire. HighWire works with
a good number of publishers (about 150), who together produce over 900
journals.  I realize for most libraries that is a drop in the bucket.
I'll repeat here some things I know that Lesley knows well:

As you note below, HighWire provides an alerting service that library
subscription administrators can sign up for to tell them (usually in
advance) of the cut-off of access.  Each year (about the same time I remind
publishers about gracing!), I email librarians on the HighWire notification
list about this service.  All these services are linked to from the "For
Institutions" tab of the HighWire home page, or directly here:
   http://highwire.stanford.edu/institutions/

The subscription alerting service, here,
   http://highwire.stanford.edu/cgi/alertsSignup/expiredsub
requires that a subscription administrator create a HighWire-wide identity,
and connect up their various subscriptions; so there is some one-time
startup effort.  That is described here:
   http://highwire.stanford.edu/institutions/subadmin/begin.dtl

Our customer service staff (available via the Contact Us button) will help
librarians through this one-time effort when questions arise.

The one additional check I can suggest is to run the "Subscriptions I
Administer" report (also available from the For Institutions tab), which
will display expiration dates for all the titles you administer, where we
have received those dates from the publisher (some publishers do not send
us expiration dates, and in those cases we provide access as long as an
institution is in the list the publisher sends; so for these HighWire can't
provide an explicit expiration date).  To run that report, once you have
done the one-time setup:

        Sign in to your HighWire account on the home page at
                http://highwire.stanford.edu
	Click on the For Institutions tab
	Follow the 'Subscriptions I Administer' link in the center column to

go to           http://highwire.stanford.edu/cgi/instadmininfo

This report works reasonably well for institutions who centralize
administration to just a few staff (who each run their respective report).
But less well when subscription administration is widely dispersed in an
institution.

Alerting services can be a help, as you suggest (at least you know about
the problem before your patrons do).  But since the volume of problems
seems not to be greatly reduced each year (is it?), it would also be
helpful for the whole industry (libraries, agents, publishers, online
platforms) to look at where the renewal-ball gets dropped, delayed, or
mis-laid.  There are some industry efforts to address this, one of which
was posted to this list last Friday 20 Jan, "Journal Supply Chain
Efficiency Improvement Pilot project gets underway".

John


--On Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:42 PM +0000 Lesley Crawshaw
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Haven't we been here before on many occasions?
>
> The ASA called upon all publishers to grace their electronic journal
> subscriptions for at least two months
> (http://www.subscription-agents.org/news/egrace.html) several years ago. I
> believe that this was a very sensible recommendation and should have been
> accepted as the standard by all publishers.
>
> Whilst one hoped that publishers might have adopted this as a standard, we
> now find that some publishers have not adopted any gracing period at all,
> some apply grace to the print, but not the electronic journal, some have
> gone for a month e.g. Blackwell Publishing, some have gone for two months
> and some for three months. How are we meant to know which publishers have
> adopted which gracing period? Is there somewhere I can go to find out what
> each publisher does? This is really important as if a gracing period has
> been adopted any underlying problems won't rear their head until the
> protection that gracing offers is removed. There is no point checking
> access if gracing has been applied as everything will appear as normal.
>
> Yet the problems with loss of access to subscribed content has not gone
> away judging from the various alerts of impending withdrawal of access
> coming into my in tray at the moment. With most services not providing
> any alerts when the access is removed one is left wondering how many
> other problems are out there, but have yet to raise their head.
>
> We've identified a few problems with publishers cutting off our access on
> the 31/12/05 (totally incomprehensible as who's around to sort these
> problems then!!) and managed to sort those, most of which I would like to
> point out relate to publishers either not following the processes through
> that would avoid the loss of online access, rather than non-payment for
> the journals in question. One publisher had employed a temporary person
> who had not entered our account as paid in the relevant database, leaving
> the publisher to believe we hadn't paid for our subscription for 2006.
> Another publisher had the paper subscription as renewed, but hadn't
> updated the web site through which the e-access was controlled.
>
> We are now getting some warnings (only from Highwire and some publishers
> hosted on Extenza I should point out) about impending loss of access on
> the 01/02/06. Others we are picking up as our users find they are having
> problems. In some cases we have found out that payments were incorrectly
> processed by the publisher or haven't been correctly matched up to our
> existing account.
>
> In some cases where we lose access we lose access to everything. If we've
> gone online only we may suddenly find we have no rights to access the full
> text at all.
>
> What we also need apart from a standard gracing period, are better
> facilities to alert ejournal administrators (I would add agents as well,
> but I don't know whether agents get such alerts from publishers) when
> there are problems with subscriptions. Few services provide this, but to
> me this is an essential requirement for any service provider/publisher. A
> lot of effort has gone into enhancing journal sites with all kinds of
> fancy stuff for users, but it sometimes appears that the same effort has
> not gone into keeping subscribers aware of when there are impending
> problems with their online access.
>
> And then of course there are the changes of publisher, changes of title,
> and all the various problems associated with these changes that often
> happen.
>
> Cheers
> Lesley
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Lesley Crawshaw, Faculty Information Consultant
> Learning and Information Services
> University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, AL10 9AB
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> email: [log in to unmask]
> phone: 01707 284662 fax: 01707 284666
> list owner: [log in to unmask]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~




-------------------
John Sack, Director
         HighWire Press, Stanford University
         Phone: 650-723-0192; fax: 650-725-9335
         http://highwire.stanford.edu/~sack
         [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager