Rick Helmich wrote:
> However, this image is in anatomical MNI space (e.g., [0 0 0] is shifted 5
> mm dorsal and 4 mm posterior), so my activations from spm do not match.
Hi Rick,
I'm very confused by this... I thought SPM results were in MNI space.
As far as I understand the various templates, from e.g.
http://imaging.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/imaging/MniTalairach
SPM's templates are in the space of MNI305 and ICBM152. Can you give
any more information/references about the shift you discuss?
Thanks,
Ged.
|