Actually, I've forgotten to update the FAQ.
I will do that tomorrow.
Thanks for the reminder.
All the best,
Mark
On 16 Nov 2006, at 18:45, Martin Kavec wrote:
> Thanks for confirmation Stefano. You are right I could have checked
> the FAQs first.
>
> Martin
>
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Marenco, Stefano (NIH/NIMH) [E] wrote:
>
>> Yes, that is our experience and Mark Jenkinson had planned to
>> update the
>> FAQ in this regard.
>>
>> Stefano Marenco, MD
>> GCAP, Clinical Brain Disorders Branch,
>> NIMH
>> 10 Center Drive, room 4S235
>> Bethesda, MD 20892
>> tel. (301) 435-8964
>> fax. (301) 480-7795
>> email: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Martin Kavec [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 10:53 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: [FSL] FUGUE with SENSE
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just would like to verify, if I am thinking about the $SUBJ
>> correctly.
>> If I
>> acquire EPI 128x128 volume with a SENSE factor of 2, in fact I
>> collect
>> only
>> 128x64 samples with (potentially) the same DWELL time. The only
>> chance
>> to
>> include the reduction of the echo train length in calculation of the
>> unwarping field is to enter DWELL/2, since FUGUE determines the
>> size of
>> phase-encoding matrix automatically from the EPI image and the phase
>> encoding
>> direction given on the command line.
>>
>> Do I get it right? Thanks,
>>
>> Martin
>>
|