JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM  December 2005

CRISIS-FORUM December 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: SoW POSITION ON NUCLEAR ENERGY

From:

Christopher McCOY <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Christopher McCOY <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:19:03 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (140 lines)

Excepting that Wind and Solar power systems presently
in utilised depend for their entire physical existence
upon significant raw material/Resource usage,
production and transport methods, and the oil etc
industries, thus simultaneously supporting certain
industries and adding to them, and looking not very
appealing, and keeping people in a
detached-from-Nature mindset which keeps people at
machines/gadgets etc, and affecting local ecostystems,
and, in the numbers required to provide sufficient
energy, the Resource usage/Eyesore etc factors/Costs
per person are significant.

As always, best position to take = Simplicity =
Reduced Demand = Makes people's lives and all of the
Environment Happier, Healthier, and better in all REAL
respects simultaneously, and costs the least !!

As said previously, there's only ONE correct way. All
others, well meaning or not, have implications,
Consequences, whether thought about, even known about,
cared about, or not. Supporting widely-held beliefs is
not always the correct answer - there's much that is
"bigger" than us Humans ! (Just take the Time of year
and its significance as one example !)

What goes around comes around !! 

Best Wishes Everyone and Jim particularly !,

Chris. M.

--- SowNet <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> PRESS RELEASE/PRESS RELEASE/PRESS RELEASE
> 
> SAVE OUR WORLD has just posted the following
> statement on both our web-sites on an updated About
> Us page, keyed to both Home pages.  We believe it
> important that environmental organisations,
> generally, declare their positions on this topic.
> 
> Happy, Happy Christmas and lets wish ourselves all a
> Fantastic New Year.
> 
> Cheers from Jim Scott, chairperson.
>
___________________________________________________________________________
> 
> 
> POSITION STATEMENT ON NUCLEAR ENERGY
> 
> Nuclear power is being promoted as the solution to
> the impending energy crisis. However, we do not
> believe this is the case. Government and big
> corporations appear to be pursuing their own agenda,
> and using misleading methods to advance their
> position. We therefore have carried out our research
> among independent sources. We have, as a result,
> arrived at a number of reasons why nuclear is an
> undesirable alternative to other forms of energy for
> averting dangerous climate change.
> 
> Firstly, nuclear energy is expensive and uneconomic.
> Even the World Nuclear Organisation has admitted
> that the overall cost of nuclear is up to four times
> more costly than wind-power! Secondly, the planned
> nuclear developments will not be available in time
> to meet the government's targets. In fact, the most
> highly recommended variety of reactor to be built
> (Westinghouse Advanced Passive 1000) would take a
> minimum of twenty years to construct.
> 
> Nuclear energy is being claimed by the UK government
> to be a carbon-free alternative, but significant
> carbon-producing processes are involved in the
> mining of uranium, in the construction of power
> stations and in the disposal of waste. Energy
> requirements for these processes depend on
> high-grade uranium ore, which is expected to be
> exhausted within 50 years. Lower quality uranium
> then available will lead to energy prices soaring in
> the future. 
> 
> With nuclear energy, there is always a risk of
> catastrophe, both at the level of management and on
> account of the technology involved. This can have a
> very serious and far-reaching effects. No really
> effective technological or other means have yet been
> found to deal with nuclear waste, including burying
> it underground. Evidence has been produced of
> Leukemia rates around power stations up to twenty
> times the normal level. Radiation is considered
> still to be a hazard to farming in North Wales
> today, twenty years after the Chernobyl disaster!
> There are also the risks of terrorist attacks on
> power plants, and of theft of radioactive materials
> by terrorist organisations.
> 
> At present, nuclear power contributes 22% of UK's
> electricity, or 8% of the total energy demand. It
> cannot resolve the energy crisis facing our country,
> as electricity is only one variety of the energy we
> so rapidly consume. We are unpersuaded that nuclear
> energy is essential, provided we reduce our energy
> demands substantially. This is in any case required
> on account of our utilising the resources, on
> average, of three planet Earths! Much of the
> political case being made for nuclear energy rests
> on the assumption that an exponential rise in
> economic growth is both desirable and unstoppable.
> Pseudoscientific arguments are being utilised in its
> favour, and the case for reducing energy demand
> ignored.
> 
> If one third of Britain's electricity consumers
> simply installed wind systems or solar panels, this,
> it is reliably claimed, would match the electricity
> capacity of the UK's nuclear program. To tackle the
> energy crisis safely and ethically, decentralisation
> of power production makes eminent sense. This would
> greatly reduce energy waste, and be more flexible
> and cost-effective, as well as providing the most
> effective, democratically managed means of meeting
> the energy needs of remote villages in developing
> countries.
> 
> [prepared by Jude Laing with Jim Scott for About Us
> pages on both web-sites: 21/12/2005]
> 
> 
> Visit: http//:www.save-our-world.net (global) and
> www.save-our-world.org.uk
> Registered charity no. 1111210 in England & Wales



		
___________________________________________________________ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JISCMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
July 2004


WWW.JISCMAIL.AC.UK

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager