Hi Jiri,
> There is a gSoap namespace issue which needs to be resolved or a
> workaround found that basically prevents a development of a generic
> SRM2 client. Another problem is that some SRMs are using modified
> WSDL (http://sdm.lbl.gov/srm-wg/srm.v2.1.1.modified.wsdl), and some
> unmodified WSDL (http://sdm.lbl.gov/srm-wg/srm.v2.1.1.wsdl). Don't you
> just love standards? Hope that sheds some light on the problem.
Thanks for this.
I had heard of the two differet WSDLs before, but never looked into them
before. Very fascinating reading! ;) A quick diff showed the following:
$ diff srm.v2.1.1.modified.wsdl srm.v2.1.1.wsdl > diff.out
$ wc -l srm.v2.1.1.wsdl srm.v2.1.1.modified.wsdl diff.out
3083 srm.v2.1.1.wsdl
3034 srm.v2.1.1.modified.wsdl
594 diff.out
Notice that the modified WSDL is shorter than the unmodified.
I'll need to try and out what these 594 differences mean!
Cheers,
Greig
--
=======================================================================
Dr Greig A Cowan http://www.ph.ed.ac.uk/~gcowan1
School of Physics, University of Edinburgh, James Clerk Maxwell Building
TIER-2 STORAGE SUPPORT PAGES: http://wiki.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/Grid_Storage
=======================================================================
|