The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  November 2005

DISABILITY-RESEARCH November 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

An astonshing claim: 1 in 6 US children has PDD/ADHD/LD

From:

Colin Revell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Colin Revell <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 10 Nov 2005 18:02:33 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (195 lines)

An astonshing claim: 1 in 6 US children has PDD/ADHD/LD....

New Mexico Board of Pharmacy to Hear Petition to Limit Exposure to Aspartame 
and Thimerosal

Dr. Kenneth Stoller, Santa Fe Pediatrician and Clinical Assistant Professor 
of Pediatrics at the University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, has 
released the text of his remarks to be made on November 14th 2005, at the 
New Mexico Board of Pharmacy's next meeting.

Santa Fe, NM (PRWEB) November 10, 2005 -- Dr. Kenneth Stoller, Santa Fe 
Pediatrician and Clinical Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at the 
University of New Mexico, School of Medicine, has released the text of his 
remarks to be made on November 14th 2005, at the New Mexico Board of 
Pharmacy's next meeting.

He is requesting that the New Mexico Board of Pharmacy issue an immediate 
advisory so that all New Mexicans who desire to receive the current flu 
vaccine receive information about what is being injected in terms of the 
amount of neurotoxic mercury in the vaccine, which is a labeling omission, 
and thus a violation of the New Mexico Drug Act (NMSA 2-1-9). Stoller 
further requests that the New Mexico Board of Pharmacy prohibit the use of 
this flu vaccine containing thimerosal to all New Mexico pregnant woman and 
children under 50 lbs.

Speech to new mexico pharmacy board on november (Advance copy):

"There is an acute public health issue that very few understand even though 
several states have banned or limited the use of vaccines containing 
Thimerosal. In the months and years to come this iatrogenic poisoning of 
Americans and New Mexicans will be fully understood; what you decide to do 
here today will be noted in the not too distant future.

The mercury-based preservative, Thimerosal (49.6% ethyl mercury), has been 
used in killed bacterial vaccines since the 1930’s without ever having 
undergone adequate testing for toxicity. In the past two decades, as the 
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 
have added many more vaccines containing Thimerosal to the routine 
vaccination schedule for all children and states have mandated these 
vaccines, children have been exposed to much higher levels of mercury 
through vaccination. During this same time period, childhood developmental 
disabilities have dramatically increased to the point where today the CDC 
estimates 1 in 6 American children is developmentally delayed with a 
diagnosis of autism, learning disabilities, attention problems or other 
learning or behavioral problems. The CDC estimates that 1 in 166 American 
children has been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (the incidence in 
boys is more like 1 in every 100). Clinical and scientific evidence is now 
emerging which is linking mercury-containing vaccines to the regressive type 
of autism in some children. There has been a 2000% increase in reported 
cases of autism in New Mexico in the last decade.

Mercury is an incontrovertibly proven neuro-toxin that has been proven to 
cause brain damage in the developing fetus as well as to children and adults 
exposed to it. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has developed 
guidelines for limiting mercury exposures to humans from many different 
sources, including air and water pollution; contaminated foods, such as 
tuna; as well as in products sold over-the-counter, such as contact lens 
solution.

In 1999, the AAP and the Public Health Service (PHS) asked that Thimerosal 
be eliminated in childhood vaccines, and the EPA and Food and Drug 
Administration (FDA) directed the vaccine manufacturers to remove mercury 
from childhood vaccines. This did not occur immediately, and six years 
later, has still not yet been fully realized.

Since 1999, vaccine manufacturers have been reducing the amount of mercury 
preservatives in killed bacterial vaccines (live virus vaccines such as MMR 
and chicken pox do not contain Thimerosal) and some now only contain trace 
amounts, depending upon the vaccine manufacturer, type of vaccine and 
whether the vaccine is being packaged in multi-dose or single-dose vials. 
Single-dose vials of killed bacterial vaccines usually only contain trace 
amounts of mercury.

The thimerosal vaccines were never recalled and lots of the thimerosal 
vaccines didn’t expire till September of this year. So, it has only been in 
the last two years that most children stopped receiving most of the 
thimerosal laden routine vaccinations.

In 1995, a 10 pound two month old infant who got the CDC and AAP recommended 
DPT and HIB vaccines could have been 110 times over the EPA limit and an 18 
pound six month old given the recommended DPT, HIB, and Hep B vaccines could 
have been 76 times over the EPA limit, depending upon the manufacturers of 
the vaccines.

Ten years later, in 2005, a 10 pound two month old baby who receives the 
recommended DTaP, HIB, IPV, and pneumococcal vaccines may or may not be at 
all over the EPA limit for single mercury exposure, depending upon the 
manufacturers, while an 18 pound six month old who got these vaccines as 
well as a dose of flu vaccine, could be 31 times over the EPA limit.

A 125 pound teenager or adult, who gets a recommended flu and meningococcal 
vaccination, could be 4-8 times over the EPA limit for a single mercury 
exposure, depending upon the manufacturers. A teen or adult who got a 
mercury-containing flu vaccine would have to weigh 551 pounds to be under 
the EPA limit for a single mercury exposure.

On January 14, 2005, the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR from 
the HHS/CDC printed a white paper entitled “Case Definitions for Chemical 
Poisoning.” On page 12, the definition for organic mercury toxicity is 
defined as >10 mcg/L in whole blood. In other words, aside form the EPA, we 
now have the CDC stating what their definition of a chemical toxicity is for 
organic mercury.

All the flu vaccine destined for children three years old and older in New 
Mexico contain thimerosal, which means they will be receiving 25 mcg of 
organic mercury per dose.

A rough estimate of total blood is 16% of body weight. So, for a 30 lb. 
child (13.64 kilograms or liters, which is the average weight of a 3 year 
old), this would be 13.64 X 0.16 = 2.18 liters of blood.

All the ethylmercury moves thru the bloodinitially at 25mcg/2.18L or 11.48 
mcg/liter. This meets the definition of a chemical toxicity by the CDC. 
However, ethylmercury doesn't stay in the blood long and is assimilated into 
the body where it does the damage to the brain and potentially other organs 
as well, such as the heart.

Giving a three year old child the flu vaccine will raise their blood level 
of organic mercury beyond what the CDC has defined as a chemical poisoning.

Furthermore, the MMWR toxicity level of 10mcg/liter is based on mercury 
inhalation of older factory workers and also on individuals with normal 
ability to excrete mercury. This does not represent the subsets, such as 
autistic children, that are deficient in their ability to excrete mercury.

Therefore, the current flu vaccine will deliver a dose of organic mercury to 
3 year old that meets the definition of a chemical poisoning by the MMWR, 
CDC and HHS. Furthermore, the recommended schedule requires that this dose 
be given twice (one month apart).

It is of interest to note that the EPA considers any material that has 
greater than 200 ppb of mercury to be hazardous waste. The flu vaccine, as 
well as tetanus booster, has thimerosal levels that exceed this value by 250 
times or 50,000 ppb mercury.

The Manufacturer’s inserts, the package labeling, do not address nor do they 
warn about the dangerous levels of organic mercury being given. This 
omission is in violation of the New Mexico Drug Act, section 26-1-9.

Given that most New Mexicans have yet to receive this year’s flu vaccine, 
thanks to delivery delays, there is still time for the Board of Pharmacy to 
issue an advisory that informs the public of this labeling oversight if 
action is taken immediately. The violation of the Drug Act was not caught 
before now, but having so come to the fore, the Board of Pharmacy must take 
immediate action to defend the health and welfare of the citizens of our 
state, and uphold the integrity of the existing statues of the NM Drug Act 
itself.

Even though I have just presented the cold facts about thimerosal (facts 
that can be backed up with references) – we all wonder, “How can this be? 
How did it come to this? How was this allowed to happen?” We must leave the 
answers to these questions to others. Perhaps the State Attorney General’s 
office?

Nevertheless, we have a responsibility to perform here and the Board of 
Pharmacy has the regulatory power to perform it. As the truth about 
Thimerosal and Aspartame becomes better know to our state's citizens, New 
Mexicans will expect no less of their Board of Pharmacy.

Proposed Additions to New Mexico Administrative Code that permanently bans 
the use of the neurotoxins thimerosal and aspartame have been presented to 
you to act upon. Giving neurotoxins to children, pregnant woman, and the 
rest of us under the guise of improving our health is a violation of human 
rights as well as numerous New Mexico Statutes. Certainly, there is 
absolutely no need for you to capitulate to industry's demands of 
acquiescence and capitulation to the FDA and its sloppy industry-manipulated 
substandards, both in the case of Aspartame and in the case of Thimerosal.

Please schedule the necessary evidentiary hearings before the Board of 
Pharmacy at your earliest convenience.

I am requesting that you issue an immediate advisory so that all New 
Mexicans who desire to receive the current flu vaccine receive information 
about what is being injected as there has been a labeling omission 
(violation). And lastly, I request that you prohibit the use of this flu 
vaccine that contains thimerosal to all pregnant woman and children under 50 
lbs.

Thank you."

Source: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/11/prweb308566.htm

_________________________________________________________________
MSN Messenger 7.5 is now out. Download it for FREE here. 
http://messenger.msn.co.uk

________________End of message______________________

Archives and tools for the Disability-Research Discussion List
are now located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager