2006 The Organizing Society - The 22nd EGOS Colloquium 2006
http://www.egosnet.org/conferences/collo22/colloquium_2006.shtml
Sub-theme 22: Organizing the Public Realm
Convenors:
Vando Borghi - Department of Sociology, University of Bologna, Italy
[log in to unmask]
Daniel Cefai - University of Paris X – Nanterre, France
[log in to unmask]
Ota de Leonardis - University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy
[log in to unmask]
Deadline for submission of abstracts: 6 January 2006.
Abstracts (800 words) must be submitted online via the EGOS web.
Call for papers:
The public realm - as a sphere of several intersecting processes and
agencies – has been characterised in the last decades by many
substantial transformations. According to many observers, the public
realm can be referred to as (1) the social property (public services;
public access to the concrete conditions of social citizenship, such as
health, social protection, education, etc.) and as (2) the possibility
of having voice in the process of constituting the public good (the
idea of public interest requiring collectivised expression; the public
as public sphere, according to debates opened by Dewey, Habermas,
etc.).
We have witnessed significant changes in the structures and processes
of defining and enacting the public realm. This takes place in spaces,
times and practices of the public in itself, and in the fields of
social and labour market policies; business and economic activities;
public administration; health services and so on. The role and activity
of both private and public organisations and institutions have been
deeply reshaped. The change ‘from government to governance’, on the one
hand, and the transformations of private organisations on the other are
both relevant in the metamorphosis of the public realm.
These transformations come from many different sources:
•
The introduction of market-like practices in public institutions;
•
An increasing plurality of actors involved in the organisation of the
public realm;
•
New demands for de-standardised and individualised services/goods;
•
A redefinition of citizens in terms of consumers;
•
A growing attention to the environmental and social limits to economic
action
The relationship between public and private can develop in different
directions. There has been a shift of social responsibilities from the
collective to the private sphere and also a rising emphasis on
corporate social responsibility. These are examples of divergent
development trends in the relationship between the private and public
spheres. Of course, some of these trends may be taking place on a
(political) rhetorical level. Social discourses have to be part of the
inquired processes, however, since they are not separable from the
organisational phenomena to which they refer.
Important organisational and institutional changes can be explored and
discussed. Relevant questions that may be addressed are:
•
What does organising the public realm mean today? Which kind of
institutional actions, processes, spaces, subjects, forms of
co-ordination among actors, etc. can we appropriately classify as
public? In which way is the public restructured as a place for
organizing a discourse in the interest of the ‘public good’?
•
The convergent / divergent paths in the public-private relationship:
How has the relationship between the private and the public sphere been
reshaped during the last decades? Do we see different development
trends in different contexts?
•
What role does the shift ‘from government to governance’ play in this
picture?
•
The social effects of organisational and institutional changes: How do
these changes affect social daily life? In which ways are gender
relationships affected?
•
The public relevance of private (economic) organizations: How do
private firms influence the public realm?
About the convenors:
Vando Borghi (email: [log in to unmask]) is Researcher at the Dept.
of Sociology, University of Bologna. He works at the Faculty of
Political Sciences, where he teaches “Sociology of Organization” and
“Organization and Entrepreneurship”. He is a member of the ‘core group’
of the Active Social Policy European Network
(http://aspen.fss.uu.nl/en) and collaborates with the research centre
Sui Generis – Laboratorio di ricerca sociologica sull’azione pubblica –
Università di Milano-Bicocca. He is also secretary of the International
Centre for Documentation and Sociological Studies on Labour Issues
(C.I.Do.S.Pe.L. - Dept. of Sociology, University of Bologna;
http://www.cidospel.com ) and board secretary of the journal
“Sociologia del lavoro”. His main research interests are about
relationships between economic spheres of social action and daily life,
and between citizenship and organizational/institutional processes.
From this perspective, he is doing research on changing relationships
between work and welfare; the metamorphoses of work organization and
the labour market; social vulnerability; and institutional and
administrative cultures. He recently published: (Ed.), Vulnerabilità,
inclusione sociale e lavoro, Angeli, Milano, 2002; (with Mauro Magatti,
Eds.), Mercato e società. Introduzione alla sociologia economica,
Carocci, Roma, 2002. With Rik van Berkel, presented a paper at the
20th European Group for Organisational Studies’ (Lubljana, 30 giugno- 3
luglio 2004), entitled New modes of governance in Italy and the
Netherlands: the case of activation policies, now revised and
forthcoming in “Public Administration”.
Daniel Cefai (email: [log in to unmask]) is Professor of Sociology
at the University of Paris X – Nanterre. His main research interests
are in the field of public and collective action, especially
participation in associations and local committees. In this field he
edited books such as Cultures politiques, PUF, 2000; Les formes de
l’action collective. Mobilisations dans des arènes publiques, Editions
de l’Ehess, 2001 (with Danny Trom); L’héritage du pragmatisme. Conflits
d’urbanité et épreuves de civisme, Editions de l'Aube, 2002 (with Isaac
Joseph); Le sens du public, PUF, 2003 (with Dominique Pasquier). He is
also writing about qualitative methodology for studying collective
action. In this field he recently edited L'enquete de terrain, La
Découverte, 2003.
Ota de Leonardis (email: [log in to unmask] is Professor of
Sociology of Cultural Processes at the University of Milano-Bicocca.
She is the Director of the MSc programme “Local Development and Social
Quality - Training in policies, organizations and programmes dealing
with critical situations” (http://www.sociologia.unimib.it/mastersqs/),
and is also the Director of the Research Centre of Sociological Studies
on Public Action Sui Generis – Laboratorio di ricerca sociologica
sull’azione pubblica – University of Milano-Bicocca. She has been
member of many local and national consulting committees for the reform
of psychiatric and prison systems, and is a member of scientific
committees for many different journals in the area of social policy and
political studies. Her main interests of research are focused on the
theory and epistemology of institutions, organizations and institutions
in local systems of governance and in institution-building processes,
cultures and practices of social justice in the social policies,
transformations of public sphere, new cultural conflicts and new
patterns of conflict solution. Some of her recent publications on these
topics include a book on welfare and its institutional and
organizational issues,entitled In un diverso welfare. Sogni ed incubi,
Feltrinelli, Milano; the introductory book to the study of
institutions, entitled Le istituzioni, Carocci, Roma, 2001; and the
article “Social Market, Social Quality and the Quality of Social
Institutions”, in European Journal of Social Quality, 1, 2000.
Guidelines for submission of abstracts/papers:
http://www.egosnet.org/conferences/sub_guidelines.shtml
|