I take enabling as supporting my neighbour in his/her self-developping and
as an empirical researching as creating the conditions for him/her to construct
and communicate his/her own ontological account firsthand.
I have serious issues with my colleagues defining my neighbours and deciding
what is good for them/ him/her, what/who he/she is/ they are. I wish to
include a direct and firsthand communication of ontology in empiricism.
It was not permitted and killed as the definition of empiricism.
Being-in-relationships, for me, means more beings then relationships. It
is the being that constructs the relationships not the other way around.
Alon
>-- Original Message --
>Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 11:29:12 +0100
>Reply-To: Chris Keeble <[log in to unmask]>
>From: Chris Keeble <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Suffering
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>
>.. perhaps using your talent to enable your 'neighbour' achieve their
>flourishing; since we are 'beings-in-relationship' rather than isolated
>items. involving suffering (in the sense to bear: to endure) which would
>be
>inevitable; without it humanity may well have destroyed itself long ago?
>xc
>
>
>
>Chris Keeble Limited
>
>The Jacobean House
>
>Pinewoods
>
>Longworth
>
>Oxford
>
>OX13 5HH
>
>Land: +44 (0)1865821000
>
>Mobile: +44(0)7703 343536
>
>VOIP: +44(0)8700683887
>
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: BERA Practitioner-Researcher
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alon
>Serper
>Sent: 01 August 2005 10:25
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: relevant laing on scientific evaluation
>
>
>
>To verify this I ask any of you if you wish to be and enjoy being miserable,
>
>unfulfilled and constantly abused, laughed at, humilated, dehumanised?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Attachment: image001.gif
>
___________________________________________________________
Book yourself something to look forward to in 2005.
Cheap flights - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/travel/flights/
Bargain holidays - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/travel/holidays/
|