Phil, I see your point that the T1 will dominate so perhaps just linking
to the T1 storage stats from the GridPP Storage web page and changing
your titles to T2 is enough for now.
The T1 guys might be interested in how you collect stats though.
BTW I detest non-zero axes!!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Philip Clark
> Sent: 07 July 2005 00:17
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: DPM source RPMS
> "Gordon, JC (John)" <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> > Yes, obviously. But what is the rationale for having a
> table showing the
> > only Tier2s and not all GridPP Storage as it is labelled?
> Hi John,
> We probably shouldn't put ral in the table like the others,
> but we could
> include an extra block for it. Just like we do for each tier2. Plus
> maybe compare total tier 1 storage to tier 2 storage.
> However, it might
> be better to keep them separate, since this would compress the
> various tier2's down at the bottom.
> I agree "gridpp storage" is misleading. This was my mistake actually
> when starting a version of this macro. We will change this to
> total tier
> 2 storage, or something like that.
> What ideally would you like to see on this chart/monitoring page? we
> are quite flexible and could add in more. It is a bit tricky for Jamie
> to code, but I think the page is quite useful to see where everyone is
> at. Especially when SC03 can fill up space quite quickly as
> we've found
> at Edinburgh.