"Gordon, JC (John)" <[log in to unmask]> writes:
> Yes, obviously. But what is the rationale for having a table showing the
> only Tier2s and not all GridPP Storage as it is labelled?
We probably shouldn't put ral in the table like the others, but we could
include an extra block for it. Just like we do for each tier2. Plus
maybe compare total tier 1 storage to tier 2 storage. However, it might
be better to keep them separate, since this would compress the
various tier2's down at the bottom.
I agree "gridpp storage" is misleading. This was my mistake actually
when starting a version of this macro. We will change this to total tier
2 storage, or something like that.
What ideally would you like to see on this chart/monitoring page? we
are quite flexible and could add in more. It is a bit tricky for Jamie
to code, but I think the page is quite useful to see where everyone is
at. Especially when SC03 can fill up space quite quickly as we've found