JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  July 2005

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM July 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

intrigues around the Munich mosque

From:

Nick Solly Megoran <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Nick Solly Megoran <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:56:09 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (719 lines)

This article is a fascinating example of the role of a single place (Munich 
mosque) in a series of geopolitical intrigues.  The author of the piece 
clearly has an agenda.  Any comments on this from people who have more 
background knowledge on the subject?

Nick

-


A mosque for ex-Nazis became center of radical Islam

Tuesday, July 12, 2005

By Ian Johnson, The Wall Street Journal


MUNICH, Germany -- North of this prosperous city of engineers and auto 
makers is an elegant mosque with a slender minaret and a turquoise dome. A 
stand of pines shields it from a busy street. In a country of more than 
three million Muslims, it looks unremarkable, another place of prayer for 
Europe's fastest-growing religion.

The mosque's history, however, tells a more-tumultuous story. Buried in 
government and private archives are hundreds of documents that trace the 
battle to control the Islamic Center of Munich. Never before made public, 
the material shows how radical Islam established one of its first and most 
important beachheads in the West when a group of ex-Nazi soldiers decided 
to build a mosque.

The soldiers' presence in Munich was part of a nearly forgotten subplot to 
World War II: the decision by tens of thousands of Muslims in the Soviet 
Red Army to switch sides and fight for Hitler. After the war, thousands 
sought refuge in West Germany, building one of the largest Muslim 
communities in 1950s Europe. When the Cold War heated up, they were a 
coveted prize for their language skills and contacts back in the Soviet 
Union. For more than a decade, U.S., West German, Soviet and British 
intelligence agencies vied for control of them in the new battle of 
democracy versus communism.

Yet the victor wasn't any of these Cold War combatants. Instead, it was a 
movement with an equally powerful ideology: the Muslim Brotherhood. Founded 
in 1920s Egypt as a social-reform movement, the Brotherhood became the 
fountainhead of political Islam, which calls for the Muslim religion to 
dominate all aspects of life. A powerful force for political change 
throughout the Muslim world, the Brotherhood also inspired some of the 
deadliest terrorist movements of the past quarter century, including Hamas 
and al Qaeda.

The story of how the Brotherhood exported its creed to the heart of Europe 
highlights a recurring error by Western democracies. For decades, countries 
have tried to cut deals with political Islam -- backing it in order to 
defeat another enemy, especially communism. Most famously, the U.S. and its 
allies built up mujahadeen holy warriors in 1980s Afghanistan to fight the 
Soviet Union -- paving the way for the rise of Osama bin Laden, who quickly 
turned on his U.S. allies in the 1990s.

Munich was a momentous early example of this dubious strategy. Documents 
and interviews show how the Muslim Brotherhood formed a working arrangement 
with U.S. intelligence organizations, outmaneuvering German agencies for 
control of the former Nazi soldiers and their mosque. But the U.S. lost its 
hold on the movement, and in short order conservative, arch-Catholic 
Bavaria had become host to a center of radical Islam.

"If you want to understand the structure of political Islam, you have to 
look at what happened in Munich," says Stefan Meining, a Munich-based 
historian who is studying the Islamic center. "Munich is the origin of a 
network that now reaches around the world."

Political and social groups affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood now 
dominate organized Islamic life across a broad swath of Western Europe. 
These connections are frequently little known, even by the intelligence 
services and police agencies of these countries.

While these groups renounce terrorism and officially advocate assimilation, 
the upshot of their message is that Europe's Muslims -- now representing 
between 5 percent and 10 percent of the continent's population -- need to 
be walled off from Western culture. This in turn has helped create fertile 
ground for violent ideas. Islamic terrorists have increasingly used Europe 
as a launching pad for their attacks, from the Sept. 11 assault on the U.S. 
to last year's bombing of trains in Madrid.

These current tensions are embedded in the events of half a century ago. 
Postwar Munich was a ruined city packed with Muslim emigres fleeing 
persecution. While the West tried to observe and control them as valuable 
pawns in the Cold War, they encountered formidable rivals seeking their own 
power bases in Europe's burgeoning Muslim world.

Over the next few decades, four men would try successively to control the 
Munich mosque: a brilliant professor of Turkic studies, an imam in Hitler's 
SS, a charismatic Muslim writer with a world-wide following and a 
hard-nosed Muslim financier now under investigation for backing terrorism. 
Most favored some sort of accommodation with the West. But the victor had a 
bolder vision: a global Islam opposed to the ideals of secular democracy.


The Scholar


Gerhard von Mende's interest in Muslims originated in 1919, when his father 
was murdered. The family had lived in Riga, part of a once-large German 
minority in Latvia. When the tiny land was invaded by the Red Army at the 
end of World War I, members of the bourgeoisie were rounded up and sent on 
a forced march. Mr. von Mende's father, a banker, was pulled out of the 
line and shot dead.

That awakened in the 14-year-old a loathing of things Russian. After 
fleeing with his mother and six siblings to Germany, he chose to study 
other people who were oppressed by Russian rule -- the Muslims of Central 
Asia. A blizzard of papers and books brought him academic prominence. 
Linguistically gifted, he spoke fluent Russian, Latvian and French, as well 
as passable Turkish and Arabic. When he married a Norwegian, he picked up 
her native tongue as well.

The Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 put a premium on people like 
Mr. von Mende, who understood something about the lands that Germany's 
blitzkrieg was overrunning. He kept his job at Berlin University but was 
seconded to the new Imperial Ministry for Occupied Eastern Territories -- 
or Ostministerium -- to head a department overseeing the Caucasus.

Germany's initial victories left it with staggering numbers of Soviet 
prisoners -- five million in all. Due in part to the efforts of Mr. von 
Mende and the Ostministerium, Hitler agreed to free prisoners who would 
take up arms against the Soviets. The Nazis set up "Ostlegionen" -- Eastern 
Legions -- made up primarily of non-Russian minorities eager to pay Moscow 
back for decades of oppression. Up to a million soldiers took up Hitler's 
offer.

As the war progressed, Mr. von Mende became one of the chief architects of 
the Nazi policy toward Soviet minorities. He was dubbed their 
"lord-protector," establishing national committees of Tatars, Turks, 
Georgians, Azerbaijanis and Armenians. Desperate for soldiers, the Nazis 
viewed these committees as little more than a way to keep their turncoat 
allies in the war. But for the people involved, they were like 
governments-in-exile, a taste of independence for which they were grateful 
to Mr. von Mende.

Colleagues from this era describe Mr. von Mende as a well-dressed, regal 
man with a wry smile, who used his personal charm to win over the exiles -- 
especially his favorites, the Turkic Muslims of Central Asia. He opened his 
home in Berlin to them for long dinners with the conversation flowing in 
Russian, Turkish and German. In the last months of the war, he cemented 
their loyalty through an act of bureaucratic genius: With Germany's 
infrastructure bombed to a pulp, he managed to get thousands of "his" Turks 
transferred to the western front -- Greece, Italy, Denmark and Belgium -- 
figuring it would be better if they ended up in British or American 
prisoner-of-war camps than Soviet. Those who fell into Soviet hands were 
shot as traitors.

By the late 1940s, hundreds of Muslim ex-soldiers were stranded in the U.S. 
zone of occupation in Munich. Mr. von Mende, whose Nazi past left him with 
limited job prospects, decided to devote himself to looking out for them.

That decision would prove beneficial -- both for the Muslims and for Mr. 
von Mende. It was the beginning of the Cold War and Western intelligence 
agencies were desperate for anyone who could provide a glimpse behind the 
Iron Curtain. They needed people to analyze documents, broadcast 
anti-Soviet propaganda and recruit spies.

In October 1945, Mr. von Mende wrote a letter to a "Major Morrison" in the 
British Army, according to a letter in his private papers that his family 
made available. He laid out the Ostministerium's unique source of knowledge 
about the Soviet peoples. He explained who worked for it and in which POW 
or Displaced Persons camp they were being held. It was the beginning of his 
intelligence career.

Mr. von Mende settled in the British-occupied sector of Germany, in the 
commercial center of Dusseldorf. Although he was no longer an academic, he 
called his office the "Eastern European Research Service." His staff was 
made up of ex-Ostministerium employees -- basically a re-creation of the 
Nazi apparatus that oversaw the Muslims during the war. Funding came from 
British occupation forces initially, then a variety of West German 
agencies, including the national domestic intelligence agency and the 
German foreign ministry, according to foreign-ministry documents and Mr. 
von Mende's private correspondence.

Mr. von Mende spent enormous amounts of time helping the Muslims who used 
to work for him in the Ostministerium. He wrung money out of the West 
German bureaucracy for them to be fed, clothed and housed -- conditions 
were appalling and even a decade after the war's end many were still living 
in barracks.

But at heart, his task was simple: keep tabs on the emigres and prevent 
them from falling into another country's control. The main threat was the 
Soviet Union, which wanted to stop the emigres from making anti-communist 
propaganda. Some emigre leaders in West Germany were murdered. Many carried 
weapons in defense against KGB assassins.


CIA vs. Nazi Imam


By 1956, a rival emerged to threaten Mr. von Mende's control over the 
Muslim ex-soldiers of Munich: the American Committee for Liberation from 
Bolshevism, widely known as Amcomlib. Set up as a U.S. nongovernmental 
organization to run Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty, Amcomlib was in 
fact a thinly disguised front for the Central Intelligence Agency. CIA 
funding lasted until 1971 when Congress cut Amcomlib's ties to the 
intelligence agency.

During the 1950s, the head of Amcomlib's political organization was Isaac 
Patch, who is now 95 and living in retirement in New Hampshire. Reached by 
telephone, Mr. Patch defended Amcomlib's strategy of using Muslims to fight 
the Soviets. "Islam was an important factor, no question about it," Mr. 
Patch said. "They were strong believers and strong anti-communists."

Amcomlib forged ties with Ibrahim Gacaoglu, a former Nazi soldier from the 
Caucasus who, like Mr. von Mende, was looking after Muslim soldiers 
stranded in Germany. Mr. Gacaoglu controlled food packages from the U.S., 
which he doled out to his followers, according to his organization's 
documents. Mr. Gacaoglu also did propaganda work for Radio Free Europe. In 
1957, for example, he held a news conference with another former German 
political officer, Garip Sultan, who headed Radio Liberty's Tatar service, 
according to documents and Mr. Sultan. The two decried Stalin's abuses in 
Chechnya. Mr. Sultan, now 81 years old, said in an interview that he wrote 
Mr. Gacaoglu's speeches and a pamphlet for him on the situation of Muslims.

For Mr. von Mende and his colleagues, Mr. Gacaoglu's CIA connections were a 
problem. West Germany and the U.S. were on the same side of the Cold War, 
but Mr. von Mende didn't appreciate foreign agencies trying to influence 
German residents. As one informant had put it in a report to his boss: 
"Germany is a gate that no one controls because there doesn't seem to be a 
gatekeeper. Everyone comes and does what he pleases."

Mr. von Mende decided that Germany's Muslims needed a leader he could 
trust. He turned to a friend from the war: Nurredin Nakibhodscha Namangani.

Mr. Namangani had come from a long line of imams in his native land, 
modern-day Uzbekistan. But his religious service had mostly been in an 
unholy organization: Hitler's infamous SS. According to an autobiographical 
sketch he gave German authorities, he had been arrested by Stalin's 
security forces in 1941 and soon after liberated by the invading German 
army. He served as imam in various capacities, ending as imam for an SS 
division. He won some of Germany's highest commendations, including the 
Iron Cross.

Mr. Namangani arrived in Munich in 1956 to an uproar. Opponents such as Mr. 
Gacaoglu charged Mr. Namangani with having participated in wartime 
atrocities. Mr. Namangani's unit reportedly helped put down the 1944 Warsaw 
uprising of Polish partisans against the Nazis, but any personal role in 
atrocities is not evident in German war records.

Mr. von Mende beat back the attacks, persuading the federal government in 
Bonn to accept Mr. Namangani as the "Hauptimam" or "chief imam" of 
Germany's Muslims, on the West German payroll.

In late 1958, Mr. Namangani came up with a plan to rally the ex-Muslim 
soldiers behind him: a "Mosque Construction Commission." At the time, 
Germany had only a couple of mosques. Munich's mosque would be different: 
bigger and dedicated not to traders and visitors but to Germany's first 
permanent Muslim population of any note.

"For 13 years, Muslims haven't had a fixed place for their services and 
have had to hold them in various places," Mr. Namangani told the assembled 
50 or so Muslims, including some Muslim students from the Middle East. 
Once, Muslims had been forced to hold services even in a brewery, other 
times in a museum, according to minutes of the mosque commission. Now, he 
told the group, Munich would be a center for Muslims and the Bavarian state 
government would certainly help out, according to the minutes.

It was a big event, so big in fact that someone special was on hand: Said 
Ramadan, the Geneva-based secretary general of the World Islamic Congress, 
a group that wanted to unite Muslims around the world. The rest of those 
assembled donated 125 marks in total (about $275 in today's money) for the 
mosque's construction. Mr. Ramadan himself gave 1,000 marks.

Mr. von Mende quickly put out feelers for information on the well-heeled 
visitor. Soon, his index of people to watch contained a new entry:

"Said Ramadan, Geneva. Circa 36 years old, 3 children. Since 1956 drives an 
expensive Cadillac, gift of the Saudi Arabian government. R.S. (sic) is 
supposed to be a member of the Muslim Brotherhood."


The Brotherhood Arrives


Said Ramadan's arrival in Europe was the result of a clash of ideas that 
continues to tear at Islamic societies. At heart, the problem is how to 
reconcile Islam with the modern nation-state. Like many religions, Islam is 
all-embracing, prescribing behavior in many spheres, politics included. But 
when taken literally, these requirements can clash with today's liberal 
democracies, which promote individual freedom.

In 1920s Egypt, a young schoolteacher named Hasan al-Banna came down firmly 
on the side of orthodoxy. Troubled by what he saw as the immorality of a 
rapidly modernizing Egypt, he set up an organization called the Muslim 
Brotherhood. His plan was to re-Islamicize society by teaching the 
fundamentals of Islam in the everyday language of the coffee shop, not the 
classical Arabic of mosques. He set up welfare organizations and was famous 
for his commitment to social justice.

But this collided with other visions of Egypt, especially those imported 
from the West, such as socialism and fascism. Heavily involved in the 
turbulent politics of postwar Egypt, Mr. Banna was assassinated in 1949. A 
few years later, a military coup brought in a socialist government that 
banned the group in 1954.

Many members were thrown in jail and some were executed. Mr. Ramadan was 
the most prominent member to flee abroad. He was Mr. Banna's son-in-law and 
was famous for having helped organize Jerusalem's defense against the new 
state of Israel in 1948. Few countries in the region wanted to shield Mr. 
Ramadan; Egypt was a regional powerhouse and its neighbors were wary of 
antagonizing it. After stops in Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and Pakistan, he 
arrived in Geneva in the summer of 1958 on a Jordanian diplomatic pass, 
accredited to the U.N. and also neighboring West Germany.

While in Germany, he set out his ideas in a doctoral thesis called "Islamic 
Law: Its Scope and Equity." It was published as a book and became a classic 
of modern Islamist thinking.

"He was decent and intelligent," says his doctoral adviser at Cologne 
University, Gerhard Kegel, now 93, "if a little fanatical."

Not fanatical in the sense of advocating violence, Mr. Kegel says, but in 
his view of a world in which Islam guides all laws and there is no 
distinction between religion and state. Mr. Ramadan also published a 
magazine, Al-Muslimoon, which surveyed events in the Muslim world and 
criticized secularism.

Mr. Ramadan, like others in the Muslim Brotherhood, strongly opposed 
communism for rejecting religion. During the Cold War, that made him a 
natural ally of the U.S. But Mr. Ramadan also opposed the U.S. and other 
Western countries for their interference in Mideastern affairs. Then as 
now, that put people like Mr. Ramadan in a tough position: They needed to 
cooperate with the West but didn't want to be Western collaborators.

Historical evidence suggests that Mr. Ramadan worked with the CIA. At the 
time, America was locked in a power struggle with the Soviet Union, which 
was supporting Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser. As Nasser's enemy, the 
Brotherhood seemed like a good ally for the U.S.

A document from the German foreign intelligence service, known by its 
initials BND, says the U.S. had helped persuade Jordan to issue Mr. Ramadan 
a passport and that "his expenditures are financed by the American side." 
Swiss diplomats concurred that the U.S. and Mr. Ramadan were close. 
According to a 1967 diplomatic report in the Swiss federal archives: "Said 
Ramadan is, among others, an information agent of the British and 
Americans."

When the Swiss newspaper Le Temps reported the contents of the diplomatic 
report last year, the Ramadan family responded in a letter to the editor 
that read in part: "Our father never collaborated with American or English 
intelligence services. He was, on the contrary, the subject of permanent 
surveillance for numerous years."

Members of the Ramadan family refused to comment. They include two sons, 
the popular Muslim intellectual Tariq and his brother, Hani, who heads an 
Islamic center in Geneva that his father set up.


A Fateful Alliance


Although he was fortunate to have escaped the Middle East, Mr. Ramadan's 
Swiss exile cut him off from his base of support. He began to look around 
for allies, according to colleagues who knew him then. Soon, an opportunity 
presented itself: He was contacted in 1958 by some Arab students in Munich 
eager to build a new mosque.

The students had come to Germany to study medicine, engineering and other 
disciplines in which German education excelled. Many had been involved with 
the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and were also using the chance to escape 
persecution. Mr. Ramadan "was a gifted orator and we all respected him," 
says Mohamad Ali El-Mahgary, who now heads an organization affiliated with 
the Munich mosque, the Islamic Center of Nuremberg.

The students quickly united in wanting to get rid of Mr. Namangani, the 
former SS imam. Fired up by Muslim Brotherhood ideology, they saw the Uzbek 
as a throwback to an earlier era, one where, for example, local traditions 
allowed for drinking alcohol when this was expressly forbidden in the 
Quran. Over the next three years, Mr. Ramadan and the Brotherhood showed 
their political mettle -- first sidelining the soldiers and their German 
allies, then striking out on their own.

First Mr. Ramadan teamed up with Amcomlib to undermine Mr. Namangani. In 
1959, he organized the "European Muslim Congress" in Munich, which Mr. von 
Mende's informants reported was co-financed by Amcomlib, according to 
German foreign-ministry archives and Mr. von Mende's personal letters. The 
goal: marginalize Mr. Namangani by making Munich's mosque a European-wide 
center, not just for Munich's Muslims. For the U.S., this would help 
strengthen their man, Mr. Gacaoglu, and limit the West Germans' influence 
over the emigres.

In 1960, Mr. Ramadan took formal control of the mosque-construction 
commission, with the students convincing the former soldiers that only Mr. 
Ramadan could raise the money needed for a mosque, according to interviews. 
Mr. Ramadan was elected chairman and Mr. Namangani relegated to deputy.

Flummoxed, Mr. von Mende tried to figure out what Mr. Ramadan's goals were. 
His reports show that he was convinced that Mr. Ramadan was working with 
the U.S. But he needed confirmation and so turned to Germany's 
foreign-intelligence service. In a private letter to a former colleague in 
the Ostministerium, Mr. von Mende asked for information on Mr. Ramadan and 
suggested stealing files from his office in Geneva. He even estimated how 
much the operation would cost, bribes and travel costs included. Mr. von 
Mende's BND contact confirmed that Mr. Ramadan was backed by the U.S. As 
for stealing his files, the colleague advised against it: Mr. Ramadan was 
"much too careful" to leave valuable information in them.

Adding to Mr. von Mende's worries was that the CIA was now openly backing 
Mr. Ramadan. In May of 1961, a CIA agent attached to Amcomlib in Munich, 
Robert Dreher, brought Mr. Ramadan to Mr. von Mende's office in Dusseldorf 
for a meeting to propose a joint propaganda effort against the Soviet 
Union, according to Mr. von Mende's personal papers and interviews with 
contemporaries of the men. Mr. von Mende quickly turned them down.

Mr. von Mende decided he had to use Mr. Namangani to engineer Mr. Ramadan's 
removal. At first, it appeared the two had succeeded. In late 1961, Mr. 
Namangani called a meeting of the mosque commission. Mr. Ramadan was 
accused of financial irregularities. The soldiers put forward a new 
candidate and in a close vote won a simple majority. In memos to each 
other, German officials crowed that Mr. Ramadan was gone and with him the 
plans for a "monumental mosque."

But a sharp-eyed city government official noted that the commission's 
by-laws had required that Mr. Namangani's candidate win a two-thirds 
majority. The simple majority hadn't been enough. Once again Mr. Ramadan's 
ability to mobilize had been decisive: His students had turned out in 
force, unlike Mr. Namangani's more-numerous soldiers. Mr. Ramadan was still 
in charge of the mosque commission.

Discouraged, the soldiers began to leave the commission. Mr. Namangani 
remained head of the West German organization that oversaw the former 
soldiers' spiritual needs, but had nothing more to do with the mosque. In a 
seven-page letter to German officials that is now in the Bavarian state 
archives, Mr. Namangani explained he was tired of fighting Mr. Ramadan. 
"The Mosque Construction Commission has drifted far from its original goal 
and there is the danger that it will become a center for those engaged in 
politics," he wrote.

The emigres' departure from the mosque commission slowed its progress but 
didn't hurt it. The German bureaucracy, packed with many former Nazis, was 
still sympathetic to the idea of building a mosque, memos among officials 
show. They apparently didn't know that their former comrades-in-arms had 
left the commission. The West German bureaucracy even gave the mosque 
project, now firmly under Muslim Brotherhood control, tax-exempt status, 
which would be worth millions over the next decades.

Mr. von Mende, though, realized that his Turks were left in the political 
wilderness. In memos to the German foreign ministry, he said the federal 
government must do everything possible to block Mr. Ramadan, whom he saw as 
a foreign-backed outsider. Whether Mr. von Mende could have stopped Mr. 
Ramadan is unknown: In December 1963, while sitting at his desk in 
Dusseldorf, Mr. von Mende had a massive heart attack and died immediately. 
He was 58 years old.

A few months later, his Eastern European Research Service was closed and 
Mr. von Mende's network of informants dried up. It would only be decades 
later, after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the U.S., that Germany would 
seriously focus domestic intelligence on the Brotherhood's Munich 
operations.


The Banker's Vision


Cloaked from outside scrutiny, the mosque had less and less to do with the 
needs of Munich's Muslims. And around this time, evidence of the CIA's 
involvement dried up. Instead, control eventually passed to an unlikely 
location: Campione d'Italia, a swath of mansions and millionaires in the 
Swiss Alps. Here, from a terraced villa overlooking Lake Lugano, one of Mr. 
Ramadan's trusted lieutenants, Ghaleb Himmat, ran the Munich mosque and 
influenced the network that grew out of it.

Of all the characters in the mosque's history, Mr. Himmat is the most 
enigmatic, although he is one of the few still alive. A Syrian, he went to 
Munich in the 1950s to study but ended up amassing wealth as a merchant. 
Now under investigation by several countries for links to terrorism, he 
normally shuns publicity. He agreed to comment briefly on the telephone for 
this article.

Contemporaries and archival records indicate that Mr. Himmat was a driving 
force behind the mosque. In 1958, members of the mosque commission say, he 
led the movement to invite Mr. Ramadan to Munich. Documents show that the 
two worked closely together. They went on fund-raising trips abroad and Mr. 
Himmat stood in for Mr. Ramadan when the older man was back in Geneva.

Mr. von Mende's death should have left Mr. Ramadan firmly in charge of the 
project. But over the next few years, he lost control to Mr. Himmat. The 
exact nature of their split isn't clear, but close associates say it had to 
do with their different nationalities. Mr. Himmat denies this, saying he 
does not know why Mr. Ramadan left.

At the same time, Mr. Ramadan was losing the support of his Saudi backers. 
Short of money, he stopped publishing his magazine in 1967. Over the last 
quarter century until his death in 1995, Mr. Ramadan's influence waned. His 
son Tariq describes him in a book as prone to "long silences sunk in memory 
and thoughts, and, often, in bitterness."

Mr. Himmat assumed control of the mosque just before it opened in August of 
1973. Under his leadership, the mosque grew in importance, functioning as 
the Muslim Brotherhood's de facto European embassy. As its influence grew, 
its name changed. From Mosque Construction Commission, the group became the 
Islamic Community of Southern Germany and, today, the Islamic Community of 
Germany. It is now one of the country's most important Islamic 
organizations, representing 60 mosques and Islamic centers nationwide.

The group also became a cornerstone in a network of organizations that have 
promoted across Europe the Muslim Brotherhood way of thinking. The Islamic 
Community of Germany, for example, helped found the U.K.-based Federation 
of Islamic Organizations in Europe, which unites groups close to the Muslim 
Brotherhood and lobbies the European Union.

Mr. Himmat says the mosque has always been open to all Muslims but that the 
Brotherhood came to dominate it because its members are the most active. 
"If the Muslim Brotherhood considers me one of them, it is an honor for 
me," Mr. Himmat said in the telephone interview. "They are nonviolent. They 
are for interreligious discussion. They are active for freedom."

For decades, German authorities paid little attention to the activities in 
Munich, viewing them as unconnected to German society. They were slow to 
grasp the warning signs. In 1993, after a car-bomb attack on the World 
Trade Center in New York killed six and injured 1,000, investigators 
discovered that one of the organizers was Mahmoud Abouhalima, who had 
frequented the mosque. He was tried in the U.S. and in 1994 was sentenced 
to life in prison without parole. German domestic intelligence began to 
observe the mosque, intelligence officials say, but dropped their efforts 
after a short while when no links to terrorism appeared.

The Sept. 11 attacks changed that. Three of the four lead hijackers had 
studied in Germany, as did another key organizer. As German and U.S. law 
enforcement searched for clues, some, it is only now becoming apparent, led 
back to the Munich mosque.

Mr. Himmat, it turned out, was one of the founders of Bank al-Taqwa, a 
Bahamas-based institution whose shareholder list is a who's who of people 
associated with the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe. The bank has been 
identified by investigators in several Western countries as having links to 
terrorism. Investigators believe the bank helped channel money to the 
Palestinian terrorist group Hamas and may have transferred money for al 
Qaeda operatives.

In 2001, the U.S. issued a list of "designated" terrorists that included 
Mr. Himmat and a fellow shareholder, Youssef Nada. The Treasury Department 
froze their U.S. assets. Last month, Swiss authorities dropped their own 
investigation, citing lack of evidence. The men's money, however, remains 
frozen and the U.S. has indicated that it is continuing its investigation.

Messrs. Himmat and Nada deny any involvement in terrorism. A longtime 
member of the Munich mosque, Mr. Nada said in an interview that he no 
longer attends it or its board meetings. He said the mosque wasn't a formal 
headquarters for the Brotherhood because the group is no longer a formal 
organization. Now, he says, it has become something different: a matrix of 
ideas. "There is no form you sign," Mr. Nada said. "We are not an economic 
and political organization. We are a way of thinking."

The U.S. terror-funding investigation was enough to end Mr. Himmat's career 
at the Islamic Community of Germany. In 2002, he resigned, he said, because 
by being put on the terrorism watch list he was no longer able to sign 
checks for the community, meaning it couldn't pay its staff. He says the 
organization is doing well on its own and he doesn't contemplate returning 
to it. "It is running," he said. "There is no need."

In April, German police raided the mosque, claiming that it was involved 
with money laundering and spreading intolerant material, a crime in 
Germany. Police carted off computers and files from the offices. That was 
one of several raids on the center, although none have resulted in charges.

Mosque officials say the organization's days as a focal point of political 
Islam are long over. "This center has developed from a center that was 
important in Germany and internationally to a local institution," says 
Ahmad von Denffer, a leader of the mosque. The Islamic Community of Germany 
has since moved its operations to Cologne, where its current president 
resides.

Inside the world of political Islam, though, the Islamic Center of Munich 
remains something special. Some of the ideology's top leaders have served 
or spoken there. And the Muslim Brotherhood's current murshid, or "supreme 
guide," Mahdy Akef, headed the center.

Mr. Akef fondly remembers his time in Munich from 1984 to 1987. A short, 
friendly man with an elfish smile and big glasses, Mr. Akef says the center 
is now one of several belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood in Europe. During 
his stay there, he says, visiting statesmen from the Muslim world visited 
the Munich mosque to pay respects to the world's most powerful Islamic 
organization. The mosque was so important that when he was arrested in 
Egypt in the 1990s on allegations that he had tried to form an Islamic 
political party, one of the charges against him was that he headed the 
center.

The Muslim Brotherhood is still formally banned in Egypt but a tiny office 
in Cairo is tolerated. Sitting on a sofa under a map of the world with 
Muslim nations colored green, Mr. Akef says the Brotherhood did indeed 
spread out from Munich to others cities in Germany and Europe. Mr. Akef is 
a controversial figure who has spoken sympathetically about suicide bombers 
in Iraq. But he avoids answering questions about terrorism or 
fundamentalism. Instead, he prefers to talk about the community work the 
mosque did in Munich, helping to beautify a nearby landfill and plant pines 
in the mosque grounds.

"We made this dump beautiful and now it's full of trees," he says. "It's 
one of the most beautiful parts of Germany."


A Piece of History


Facts about the Islamic Center of Munich:


 Founded: 1958
 Construction completed: 1973
 Total cost: $1.2 million
 Number of attendees at Friday prayers: 500-600
 Location: Munich's northern suburbs


Birth of an Ideology



Some key events in the Muslim Brotherhood's evolution.


 1928: Hasan al-Banna founds the Muslim Brotherhood.
 1949: Mr. Banna is assassinated. Leadership passes to collective "guidance 
office."
 1954: Muslim Brotherhood is banned in Egypt after attempted assassination 
of Egyptian strongman Gamal Abdel Nasser; hundreds are arrested and many 
flee abroad, including Said Ramadan.
 1958: Mr. Ramadan settles permanently in Geneva. Mosque project is 
launched in Munich.
 1962: Mr. Ramadan's group of students takes control of Munich mosque 
project. Mr. Ramadan is co-founder of Muslim World League.
 1964: Muslim Brotherhood and Saudi financial backers begin to split.
 1968: Munich mosque secures financing from Libya through Ghaleb Himmat and 
Youssef Nada.
 1971: Hundreds of Muslim Brothers are released from jail in Egypt; group 
begins to move toward non-violence. During the rest of the decade, violent 
splinter groups, such as al-Gamaa al-Islamiyya, form.
 1973: Munich mosque opens. Ghaleb Himmat takes control.
 1984: Mahdy Akef takes control of Munich mosque for three years.
 1995: Said Ramadan dies.
 2001: Sept. 11 attacks in New York and Washington. Messrs Nada and Himmat 
are placed on U.S. terrorism watch list for allegedly financing terrorism. 
Investigation centers on their role in Bank al-Taqwa.
 2002: Mr. Himmat resigns from Islamic Community of Germany and is 
succeeded by Ibrahim el-Zayat. Most headquarters functions move from Munich 
mosque to Cologne where Mr. Zayat lives.
 2004: Mr. Akef becomes Muslim Brotherhood's supreme guide.

Cast of Characters
 Gerhard von Mende: Latvian-born Turkic-studies professor. Served in Nazis' 
"Ostministerium" during World War II, where he championed the Muslim 
peoples of the Soviet Union who had been conquered by the Germans. After 
the war, aided and monitored the former Soviet Muslims living in Germany. 
Died in Duesseldorf in 1963.
 Nurredin Nakibhodscha Namangani: Born in modern-day Uzbekistan to family 
of imams. Freed from Soviet jail by Nazis and served as imam for SS 
division. Returned to Germany in 1956 at Mr. von Mende's request. Served as 
imam in Munich for several decades. Died in Turkey in 2002.
 Said Ramadan: Born in Egypt, married daughter of Hasan al-Banna, who 
founded the Muslim Brotherhood. In 1954 fled Egypt after Brotherhood 
banned. Wrote Ph.D. thesis on Islamic Law at Cologne University. Went to 
Munich in 1958 to help students and ex-Nazi soldiers build mosque. Left 
mosque project in mid-1960s. Died 1995 in Geneva.
 Ghaleb Himmat: Syrian-born student who edged out Mr. Ramadan to lead 
mosque-construction project in 1973. Presided over Munich mosque's rise to 
become one of the world's most important centers of political Islam. Moved 
to Campione d'Italia, to live next to friend Youssef Nada. In 2001, 
designated by U.S. as a terrorist financier. Resigned in 2002.


A note on sources for this article



The history of the Islamic Center of Munich was drawn from interviews with 
several dozen people involved in the mosque's construction, as well as 
documents stored in 17 archives in Europe and North America. Many of the 
papers are declassified intelligence reports, some made available only in 
the past two years, although others have sat undisturbed for more than a 
decade.

In Germany, the foreign-ministry archives in Berlin provided official 
documents from Gerhard von Mende's various institutes.

Other information was culled from two Bavarian state archives in Munich, 
which show the exchanges between officials in charge of dealing with 
Germany's new Muslim population. Most of the minutes from the mosque 
construction commission come from these archives.

Another key source of information was Mr. von Mende's personal papers, 
which his family made available. These papers detailed his intelligence 
contacts, the organization of his network and personnel issues.

Here is a complete list of archives consulted:

In Germany: Gerhard von Mende, personal papers 1945-1963, in possession of 
the family, Berlin; the Federal Archives, Berlin; the Deutsche Dienststelle 
(WASt), Berlin; Political Archives of the Federal Foreign Office, Berlin; 
the Federal Commissioner for the Records of the State Security Service of 
the Former German Democratic Republic, Berlin; University Archives, 
Humboldt University Berlin; Institute of Contemporary History, Munich; 
Bavarian Central State Archives, Munich; Munich City Archives; Federal 
Archives, Koblenz; Archives of North Rhine-Westphalia, Dusseldorf.

In the U.S.: U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, Washington; 
U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, Fort Meade, Md.; Holocaust 
Museum, Washington; National Security Archive, Washington; Hoover 
Institution Library and Archives, Stanford, Calif.

In the United Kingdom: the Public Records Office, London.

In Switzerland: the Swiss Federal Archives, Bern.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Almut Schoenfeld in Berlin contributed to this article.)

Back


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright ©1997-2005 PG Publishing Co., Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager