JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives


RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Archives


RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Home

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK Home

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK  June 2005

RECORDS-MANAGEMENT-UK June 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Archive Dates

From:

"Fresko, Marc" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Fresko, Marc

Date:

Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:55:24 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (70 lines)

Fraser

An answer is set out clearly in (for example) the PRO (TNA) 2002
specification for electronic records management, and likewise in MoReq.
These specifications state that the retention period for each "retention
schedule" should start at an event chosen by the Records Manager when
that retention schedule is first defined.  The event can vary from
schedule to schedule (and is bound to); from memory (I encourage you to
check the details) it can be any one of:
- date the series or folder is opened;
- date the series or folder is closed;
- date the most recent record has been added;
- an arbitrary external event, such as the conclusion of litigation.
Then each series (i.e. class or folder in the PRO 2002 jargon) is
assigned one schedule, which is then inherited by default to all the
series below it in the classification scheme.

You could achieve something very similar by defining folders or classes
to be date-related (2005-2006 in your example) but only at the expense
of making it harder in future to find information if you do not know
precisely which year to look in.  The additional concept of "Part" (PRO)
and "Volume" (MoReq) has been introduced partly to get around this
problem

I hope this helps, despite its complexity.  The PRO 2002 definition of
this is really quite accessible, and is rather more definitive than
this.

Marc Fresko

-----Original Message-----
From: The UK Records Management mailing list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Fraser
Marshall
Sent: 29 June 2005 14:08
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Archive Dates

A question for you all.

I need to get a better understanding of the point in the records
managment process at which the dates for destruction on a record series
is set.

My belief, backed up by conversations with a few people off list, is
that the Record Series should have a single retention period applied to
it - e.g. all files in "Record Series 'X'" should be ones that need to
be retained for six years, rather than a mixture of different retention
periods.

Do I therefore determine the date for distruction based on the start
date of the Record Series - a known entity, or apply the rentention
period once the Record Series is full - which cannot be known?

Thinking out loud here, it occurs to me that one could control this by
imposing strict insistance on date ranges on Record Series - e.g.
"Record Series 'X' 2005-2006" - thus the start of the 6 year retention
period can be a known entity regardless of whether it is applied at the
start or the end of the Record Series. Does this sound reasonable?

On a similar theme; Archive dates... Since I cannot reasonably be
expected to predict how long it will take to fill a Record Series, do I
allow the individual Departmental Record Officers to determine when
archiving occurs on a basis of space requirements or redundancy?

I hope this all makes sense. Look forward to hearing your responses.

Regards,

Fraser Marshall (LB Tower Hamlets)

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager