Stephen,
> There is a
> slight problem knowing who should assess the security requirements.
Given that JRA1 reps on PTF are reviewing the JRA1 requirements, it
seems natural to me that the JRA3/Security reps (David Groep and Olle
Mullmo) on PTF should review the security requirements.
Dave
------------------------------------------------
Dr David Kelsey
Particle Physics Department
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Chilton, DIDCOT, OX11 0QX, UK
e-mail: [log in to unmask]
Tel: [+44](0)1235 445746 (direct)
Fax: [+44](0)1235 446733
------------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Burke, S (Stephen)
> Sent: 27 April 2005 17:04
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Walltime for LCG jobs
>
>
> Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gordon, JC (John)
> said:
> > I think it ridiculous that the PTF should review 370 requirements
> > without a steer from JRA1 as to which they think have been met by
> > gLite release 1. How can they tell?
>
> The PTF has representatives from all the middleware groups,
> e.g. the ones related to data management are being assessed
> by Peter Kunszt. The ones which are supposed to be satisfied
> are then being assigned to the test team to verify, although
> I'm not sure how that will work in practice. There is a
> slight problem knowing who should assess the security requirements.
>
> Stephen
>
|