JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION  April 2005

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION April 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Powell 'behind the scenes' on Bolton

From:

Christopher Crockett <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

medieval-religion - Scholarly discussions of medieval religious culture <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:06:59 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (165 lines)

medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

"Those who know Powell best"

"according to Republican sources"

"according to two people familiar with the conversations"

"a Powell spokeswoman"

"considers the discussions private"

"his former chief of staff"

"former associates say"

"he has let it be known"

"Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said on the Senate floor that Bolton's temper
should not disqualify him. 'I believe John Bolton could provide the medicine
the United Nations needs,' he said."

c

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7420-2005Apr21.html

Powell Playing Quiet Role in Bolton Battle 

GOP Senators Sought Views on Nominee 

By Jim VandeHei and Robin Wright

Friday, April 22, 2005; Page A01 

Former secretary of state Colin L. Powell is emerging as a behind-the-scenes
player in the battle over John R. Bolton's nomination as ambassador to the
United Nations, privately telling at least two key Republican lawmakers that
Bolton is a smart but very problematic government official, according to
Republican sources. 

Powell spoke in recent days with Sens. Lincoln D. Chafee (R.I.) and Chuck
Hagel (Neb.), two of three GOP senators on the Foreign Relations Committee who
have raised concerns about Bolton's confirmation, the sources said. Powell did
not advise the senators to oppose Bolton, but offered a frank assessment of
the nominee as a man who was challenging to work with on personnel and policy
matters, according to two people familiar with the conversations. 

"General Powell has returned calls from senators who wanted to discuss
specific questions that have been raised," said Margaret Cifrino, a Powell
spokeswoman. "He has not reached out to senators," and considers the
discussions private.

A spokesman for Chafee confirmed that at least two conversations took place.
Bolton served under Powell as his undersecretary of state for arms control,
and the two were known to have serious clashes. 

Powell's tenure as secretary of state was often marked by friction with the
White House on a range of foreign policy issues, disagreements that both sides
worked to keep from surfacing. It is not Powell's style to weigh in strongly
against a former colleague, but rather to direct people to what he sees as
flaws and potential problems, former associates say. Powell's views are highly
influential with many Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill. 

Those who know Powell best said two recent events provide insight into his
thinking. Powell did not sign a letter from seven other former U.S.
secretaries of state or defense supporting Bolton, and his former chief of
staff, Lawrence B. Wilkerson, recently told the New York Times that Bolton
would be an "abysmal ambassador."

"On two occasions, he has let it be known that the Bolton nomination is a bad
one, to put it mildly," a Democratic congressional aide said. "It would be
great to have Powell on the record speaking for himself, but he's unlikely to
do it." 

With a final committee vote delayed until next month, Chafee is studying
Bolton's record and withholding judgment, his spokesman said. Chafee told
reporters Wednesday he is "much less likely" to support Bolton because of
questions about his credibility. 

President Bush yesterday accused Democrats of blocking Bolton's nomination for
political reasons, as the White House intensified its campaign to confirm
Bolton and discredit his critics. 

"John's distinguished career and service to our nation demonstrates that he is
the right man at the right time for this important assignment," Bush said in a
speech to insurance agents. "I urge the Senate to put aside politics and
confirm John Bolton to the United Nations." 

Yet it was Sen. George V. Voinovich (R-Ohio) who prevented a final vote in the
Foreign Relations Committee this week and called for more time to study
Bolton's past. "The senator's motives are to do what is best for the American
people," said Marcie Ridgway, Voinovich's spokeswoman.

Chafee and Hagel share Voinovich's concerns. Powell called Hagel, asking the
Nebraska Republican if he should return Chafee's call. Hagel said that he
should and that he should be frank, the sources said. 

"I think it's being held up because Democrats oppose John Bolton, oppose him
with passion," said Foreign Relations Chairman Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), when
asked whether politics were to blame for the delay. 

Bush entered the increasingly tense showdown over Bolton's nomination as both
sides are digging in for a tough fight over the confirmation of the next U.S.
ambassador to the United Nations.

Democrats are charging that Bolton is a bully with a history of berating
people he works with and of seeking to remove those who disagree with him. The
White House is accusing Democrats of using "trumped-up" charges to prevent a
highly qualified Republican from shaking up the United Nations. The committee
yesterday failed to agree on whether Bolton should be called back to answer
more questions. 

Bolton has been accused of mistreating subordinates, including threatening a
female former government contractor and misleading members about the handling
of classified materials. Initially, Democrats opposed Bolton because of his
negative comments about the United Nations. Their attack now centers on his
character and temperament. "I do not believe that's a convincing case," Lugar
said. 

Former State Department official Carl W. Ford Jr. told the committee last week
that in 2002 Bolton sought to remove two intelligence analysts who refused to
endorse a speech he was preparing on Cuba's weapons capability.

Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), ranking Democrat on the committee, last week
released a letter from Melody Townsel, a former subcontractor for the U.S.
Agency for International Development in Kyrgyzstan, charging that Bolton
harassed her over work-related matters more than a decade ago. Since then, at
least two people have denied Townsel's charges. 

Democratic committee sources said Biden and others are opening new lines of
inquiry, including looking into a report posted yesterday on Newsweek's Web
site that Bolton twice clashed angrily with Thomas Hubbard, a former U.S.
ambassador to South Korea. 

Hubbard, who was appointed by Bush, has discussed his concerns about Bolton's
credibility with committee members. Hubbard also challenged Bolton's testimony
to the committee that he had praised Bolton for a 2003 speech denouncing Kim
Jong Il, the leader of North Korea, as a "tyrannical dictator." 

White House officials are moving quickly to address concerns among
Republicans. Matthew R. Kirk, the president's liaison to the Senate, grabbed
Voinovich shortly after this week's hearing to tell him the White House stands
ready to provide him any information he wants, GOP sources said. 

"John Bolton is someone who has a long record of getting things done, and
sometimes that's going to make people mad," White House spokesman Scott
McClellan said. 

The White House also helped organize Republicans to speak out in favor of
Bolton yesterday. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said on the Senate floor that
Bolton's temper should not disqualify him. "I believe John Bolton could
provide the medicine the United Nations needs," he said.

**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager