Good. That is reassuring. I knew what your advice was and hoped that
people in GRidPP were following it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Traylen
> Sent: 24 February 2005 12:57
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: First installation of the slc3 kit for 9.0.4 on
> LCG completed
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:41:11PM -0000 or thereabouts,
> Gordon, JC (John) wrote:
> > Do we have a plan for flavours of SL? I thought SL itself was the
> > favourite. Are many sites trying SLC3?
> I think the confusion is caused by where you happen to work,
> if you work at Cern people say SLC3 regardless of what it really is.
> At Sheffield it is
> Scientific Linux SL Release 3.0.3 (SL) , i.e not Cern.
> I think I'm correct in saying that no one is the UK is using
> the Cern variant which would be my recommendation.
> The only exceptions we currently have with in GridPP is one
> or two RHEL3 sites and a Fedora site.
> So far there has only been one major difference between the
> two versions.
> They are getting closer as far as I can see with more and
> more in the cern version coming direct from Fermilab without change.