Hi Monika,
I suggest to you using k-fold to examine the stability of your model.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
Malik Yousef,Ph.D
The Wistar Institute
University of Pennsylvania
3601 Spruce St.
Phila. PA, 19104
Phone: 215-898-3902
-----Original Message-----
From: The Support Vector Machine discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Monika Ray
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 9:53 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: training/test
Hello,
I know that its ok to not get a 100% correct result on the training set as
long as one can get good accuracy on the test set.
I was using one class svm for data that had too few ssamples for 1 class.
I got 100% accuracy on the test set, but the accuracy on the training set
was less than 50%...so should I be trusting the model? Methinks not.
What is your opinion...what should be the minimum accuracy on the training
set?
Sincerely,
Monika Ray
***********************************************************************
The sweetest songs are those that tell of our saddest thought...
Computational Intelligence Centre, Washington University St. louis, MO
**********************************************************************
|