JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  2005

POETRYETC 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Al Gore on TruthOut (Read this and weep: this was the President we elected in 2000)

From:

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and poetics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:56:01 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (51 lines)

At 09:38 AM 10/7/2005, you wrote:
>judy prince wrote:
>
>>Annie,
>>
>>Thanks for Al.
>
>I have a problem with Al.  Mainly he's a politician.  I forced myself to 
>vote for him in 2000.  While I detest the word "sincerity," something 
>about Al had the coinage value of pyrites.  I prefer not to do this 
>here--but while Bush even then was a worse choice, Gore still made me 
>unhappy.  Weep weep, my sister died of lung cancer.  Hey yo, tobacco 
>farmers, I'm onena you!  Sen. Bullshitter, D.-Tenn.  See, maybe you have 
>to live in New Jersey to appreciate the mendacity factor in politics.  I 
>once heard a speech by (the late?) Jack Anderson, 1974 sometime, when he 
>repeated "You can't trust 'em, you can't trust 'em."  And he was right.

I think you miss on this one, Ken. Bush was a candidate from central 
casting--until the extent of the disaster began to become obvious to the 
many (which only seems to have happened in the past year) most of the 
people believed whatever he said. Gore and his handlers (and Kerry and his) 
knew that he didn't have Bush's easy bonhommie, couldn't pass for "one of 
us" as Bush managed to do despite his ruling class wealth and connections, 
and they never managed to find a way to overcome this deficiency. This 
isn't a new phenomenon. We owe Ronald Reagan (who really was from central 
casting) to the fact that he could lie believably to the camera and Jimmy 
Carter was so uncomfortable on camera that he seemed to be lying when he 
told the truth.

It was never Gore's ideas that got him in trouble, because not enough 
people listened to his ideas. It was that he seemed less like a "leader" 
than the guy who had in fact failed as the leader of every business he'd 
tried to run except for his PR stint in sports.

Here's something that tall, handsome Al Gore approaches but doesn't 
address: absent the serious debate of ideas in a public forum attended by a 
populace capable of understanding and being concerned about the issues, 
image rules. It's unlikely that there will ever again be a short, 
unattractive major party candidate for president again (Nixon lost the 
first time because of five-o'clock shadow, and the politicos took note. 
Stevenson, before him, was ridiculed because he had a hole in his shoe). 
Female candidates will be allowed to be short, but not unattractive in 
conventional terms. Because politics, as Gore points out, has become the 
selling of a product, and packaging counts.

Of course, we'll also never have a major-party candidate for political 
office who isn't a politician--it seems a contradiction in terms. And given 
our winner-take-all election system, third parties are for suckers.

Mark 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager