JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  2005

POETRYETC 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Poem/Play (was Re: Pinter on Blair et al.)

From:

George Hunka <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and poetics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:26:18 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (130 lines)

"What has happened to this lineage of physical theater?"

*sigh*

And that's a sigh of sadness. Among the various liberations of the 
1960s, at least in this country, was the theater from the drama, or at 
least the written word. It's odd, since the New Theater movement here 
(Off-Off-Broadway theater, whatever you want to call it) had part of its 
start in the Poets Theaters here in New York and in Boston, John 
Ashbery, Kenneth Koch and Frank O'Hara among the participants. Composers 
Morton Feldman and John Cage, choreographers Merce Cunningham and James 
Waring, painter Mark Rothko were also all participating to one extent or 
another, and it was very exciting. But not as exciting as another strand 
of New Theater that was more interested in deconstructing popular 
culture. At the same time actors and directors chafed, and quite rightly 
so in many cases, against the authority of the playwright. A 
baby-with-the-bathwater situation, I think; I've written more 
extensively about the history of this divorce here:

http://www.ghunka.com/index.cgi/Theater/Essays/the_big_idea.html

There are still companies doing this, but much of the work is based in 
reconceptions of classic plays or in collaborative "company-created" 
texts--that is, texts without "poets" or "playwrights." But most theater 
in New York now, even most of the so-called experimental theater, is so 
driven by box-office considerations that more abstract conceptions, like 
drawing language and physical gestus closer together, are less than ever 
likely to be presented. That's the way I see it, anyway.

Stephen Vincent wrote:
> Hi George:  As somebody who participated in Grotowski workshops (not with G
> himself), I very much appreciate what you say. The work - the exercises, the
> plays with which we emerged - was the most profound exploration of the
> relationship between language and physical gesture(including voice)that I
> ever personally experienced.  In the middle of all the rhetorics of the
> Vietnam war (for and against, etc.) it was absolutely refreshing "to be" in
> the way that felt absolutely real, adventuresome, alternatively 'evil' and
> 'angelic'  (as suspect as that may sound). (In fact, My Dinner with Andrei,
> is probably the most loving satire of where we were. Andrei being Don
> Quixote, and Wally Shawn the suspect, hands on the coffee pot Sanchez)
>
> However, my question. What has happened to this lineage of physical theater
> - Grotowski  Artaud, The Living Theater, The Dancer's Workshop of Anna
> Halperin?  Is it active anywhere. I have people that ask - MFA's in poetry
> who - in spite of maybe wonderful poems writ - live in an anxious
> disembodied state wondering how to take physical presence  (poems  included)
> in the world.
>
> Stephen V
> Blog: http://stephenvincent.net/blog/
>
>
>
>
>
>   
>> I have the same concerns, Alison, though I confess I write only for the
>> theater so don't have exactly the same concerns as you have. I haven't
>> decided whether or not this constitutes some kind of reluctance on my
>> part to enter physically more into the linguistic representation of the
>> written word as opposed to that which is intended to be embodied and
>> performed by yet another body. The playwright's sharing his or her own
>> linguistic gestus with the spatial gestus of the performer is what has
>> special interest to me; for some reason there's more of a sense of
>> completeness in the finished word after I've handed it off to another
>> with the physical training and physical presence to embody that gestus
>> with far more skill than I could. It's just the way I think of my
>> writing now, and I hadn't thought of it that way until recently, which
>> makes it far more exciting to me. Whatever voice or body my own language
>> suggests I pass to another who voices it, embodies it, and I suppose
>> this constitutes the first communion or communication, artist to artist,
>> necessary to extending this communion or communication further to an
>> audience. If that makes sense. Some writers are lucky enough to be able
>> to form close aesthetic partnerships (in Beckett's late career it was
>> Jack MacGowran and Billie Whitelaw) with performers whose instincts mesh
>> with their own. It's why I've grown so interested in Grotowski's work,
>> for example. All to the best, really, as that intertwining of writer and
>> performer sustains and inspires (in the ancient sense of the word) both.
>> It's also that I suppose I'm too unconvinced of my own talent to do
>> without these others.
>>
>> As you say, clear to me (how unclear to too many others, unfortunately,
>> and my fault that), but I can't be much more precise than that myself.
>>
>> Alison Croggon wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi George, Doug, all
>>>
>>> By no means sick of hearing from you, George - It's got me thinking, this
>>> difference between play and poem, since one of my obsessions (obviously, for
>>> anyone who knows me) is their deep relatedness. I suppose a huge part of the
>>> poetic in plays and theatre is gesture and body (literally, I mean), which
>>> is so implicated in the language, and in the structures of speaking - the
>>> idea of language as action itself, the knowledge that something will be said
>>> in time and so must be graspable in time - which hardly eschews complexity
>>> (thinking of Heiner Muller here, say) - but does spin it in subtly different
>>> directions from poetry. Whereas in poems, the language carries the whole can
>>> - although of course there are many kinds of poetry, so I'm generalising
>>> wildly and unwisely. I know I want to pack a density and a quality of torque
>>> or spin into language in poems in ways which wouldn't necessarily work in
>>> theatrical language. But of course there are no border lines - at the same
>>> time, the implication of the body in poems is crucial to me. (I can really
>>> here only speak of my own practice of reading and writing) and that
>>> dimension of orality...the differences seem to me to be clear, but, like
>>> much to do with writing, almost impossible to define in any precise way.
>>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> A
>>>
>>>
>>> Alison Croggon
>>>
>>> Blog: http://theatrenotes.blogspot.com
>>> Editor, Masthead:  http://masthead.net.au
>>> Home page: http://alisoncroggon.com
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>
>
>   

-- 

George Hunka
[log in to unmask]
http://www.ghunka.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager