Jeeps, jeex, jeez, we all better get a grip!


Googlism for: suckability

Sorry, Google doesn't know enough about suckability yet.

However,

suck is better
 suck is to save
 suck is entitled to a vacation?
 suck is written by a guest reporter who's made simple
 suck is a popular site on the internet
 suck is over
 suck is right
 suck is what suck is
 suck is to
 suck is like the web; engaging
 suck is to feed a local inn or cnews server
 suck is the much needed
 suck is a card carrying member
 suck is the middle of the afternoon or later
 suck is not very likely as long as you drive with your brain engaged
 suck is seeking a drummer
 suck is greater than this value
 suck is the measurement upon which they are based
 suck is regarded as an excellent mixed fishery
 suck is to install a new chain
 suck is a very real one and is costing our businesses big time
 suck is a concept album
 suck is at the centerpiece of the sammysoft rating system
 suck is fairly short
 suck is a set9
 suck is connected to the following things
 suck is connected to because
 suck is now an independent subsidy of hotwired
 suck is
 suck is something that happens mostly on mountain bikes that are ridden a lot
 suck is available from the barnes & noble professional
 suck is a utility which allows downloading of selected news groups to a local
server via an nnrp feed; this is useful if your provider does not allow pull
 suck is up
 suck is a set9 productions inc
 suck is not the newsmagazine for you
 suck is that we have generalized too far in our treatment of christians
 suck is ridiculous
 suck is a term that describes a complex set of events inside the baby's mouth
 suck is ignoring a huge profit center and denying the masses their loser to
laugh at
 suck is just a loser
 suck is on the cd as a rpm package
 suck is sold
 suck is part of automatic media
 suck is not a craft based company
 suck is a netmoguls comic pictures
 suck is dedicated to helping the newly banned through their moment of crisis
 suck is a wonderful release with many talented artists
 suck is dead and the corpse is stinking
 suck is the major issue when you experience it
 suck is using frames
 suck is a site worth learning from
 suck is some 8oo metres
 suck is located 7 miles west of conway on state 60 then
 suck is that suck is no more
 suck is clearly disapproved of
 suck is a daily e
 suck is gone
 suck is wisely purple
 suck is vercingetorix
 suck is the musical entity that is primarily piloted by the sleepwalker
 suck is right tuk
 suck is loved by everyone from rolling stone to the
 suck is based on the idea that you can learn good design by looking at bad
design
 suck is neither a fish
 suck is present in all infants
 suck is to call attention to the horns
 suck is a singularly useful word
 suck is more than a media prank
 suck is cookin
 suck is different; he cuddles more and even pulls away during the strong flow
of a let down
 suck is its attitude
 suck is the first movie in the history of cinema to premiere over the internet in
a digital
 suck is an original online magazine of humor
 suck is a bit like that as far as web sites go

Rebecca
---- Original message ----
>Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 23:13:42 -0500
>From: Mairead Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Re: The suckability of contemporary American poetry
>To: [log in to unmask]
>
>Who the heck is Joe??? tell me!!! Help.  What's happening????   Where am
>I??
>Is it 1999 yet???  Jeepers Creepers.  What the hell's happening here????
>Mairead
>>>> [log in to unmask] 01/02/05 10:40 PM >>>
>I am real lost, or this thread has lost me. For awhile I got the
>impression
>the focus was on suckable mints somehow conflated into a Mintie poetry
>magazine that Mairead at some point graced, but this was after episodes
>of
>discussing whether or not Joe had suckered us with his parodies (during
>which I remember falling asleep, not suckering or getting suckered by
>any of
>it), and now I am trying to figure out if what will come up now - under
>the
>'suckability' rubric - is if we are going down some rarely chartered,
>perhaps totally new poetrylistserv history on or as to who - among
>poets, I
>assume - has the ability to suck (as a negative, critical consequence in
>his/her own poems, or as in the action of something more intimate, to
>what
>or whom or how, I cannot imagine), yet to talk about it as in matters of
>content, technique, and qualities - which I guess - we, as poet tasters
>-
>are either already expert or will become so during the ensuing
>discussion.
>
>Am I still totally off track. Whatever it is, purrhaps I am ready to
>hear
>it.
>
>Stephen V
>Blog: http://stephenvincent.durationpress.com
>
>
>
>
>> Ok, I'm praying too, you must be at the breaking point over
>'suckableness'
>> since you misspelled your own name! so, yes, the new poetics of
>suckability,
>> it is, amen, amen, amen...
>>
>> Rebeeca
>>
>>
>> ---- Original message ----
>>> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 21:29:38 -0500
>>> From: Mairead Byrne <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Subject: Re: The suckability of contemporary American poetry
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> Okay people I can't stand misreading that suckableness any more so
>I'm
>>> changing the subject line to suckability.  Which sounds miles more
>>> competent & enticing on my view, as philosophers say.  Let's hope
>>> suckability takes off, Please God please God please God....
>>> Mairaed
>>>
>>>>>> [log in to unmask] 01/02/05 5:30 PM >>>
>>> Hi Mairead,
>>> Hey Jill Thank You!  Happy New Year!