JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  2005

POETRYETC 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: "Expressive anti-politics"

From:

Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc provides a venue for a dialogue relating to poetry and poetics <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:06:18 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (81 lines)

You missed a lot of good parties.

More to the point, in pursuit of a strategy for the moment Mattson writes 
shall we say very limited history. The 1968 Chicago protests were different 
in kind from the others, and they weren't the high point of 60s protest. 
What the marchers at the various protests did was to articulate growing 
pain about the war, creating from a vocal minority a conscious majority--by 
the end, families who couldn't have a peaceful meal together in 68 were 
marching side by side. It was the ground prepared for disengagement from 
Vietnam and a bunch of profound social changes.

I think he's right that it's not the strategy for my side for now, but I 
think he rather misses the point in his highlighting of the organizational 
activities of YAF in contrast to a politics of protest. How could he be 
unaware that what makes the success of those organizational activities 
possible is right-wing protest, the accumulated experience of thousands of 
sit-ins and more at abortion clinics, school boards, outside Terri Shiavo's 
hospice? The last is a case in point. It seems to have failed massively 
with the general public, but it was also massively successful in 
maintaining the coherence of the core 40% or so.

The public failure of the Sciavo protests, from the White House down, tells 
us two things. The first is not so useful as strategy: that the 
well-thought-out stategies and policies of the right have been trumped by 
hubris, because, in fact, with all their think tanks, they're missing some 
basic information. Which leads to the second point--that the failure at 
Chicago was not the failure of youthful hijinks as strategy, but the 
failure to speak to anyone but one's friends. It was finally, however 
achieved (protest was only a part of it), and the joining on of folks from 
the other side of the cultural divide allowed the success of the civil 
rights movement and the antiwar movement of the 60s and 70s. Those who 
didn't cross over, who simply couldn't be reached, formed the base of the 
current right wing, an increasingly embittered minority. The issue is how 
to reach the other 10% who voted for Bush and Delay's house of 
representatives. Bush seems to be helping us do that. As when he was 
elected, it's the war on terror alone that keeps him in office.

It's good to remember, as we wring our hands, that the Republican Senate 
majority represents the votes of 45% of the electorate, a result made 
possible by our archaic constitution, and that control of the house, where 
the constitution distorts the will of the majority significantly, but to a 
lesser degree, is the result of Delay's inventive endrun around traditional 
redistricting practices. And that Bush, in wartime, won by only 1% against 
a painfully ineffective candidate.

Mark



At 04:30 AM 3/31/2005, you wrote:
>I think this is a very fine article; certainly it illuminates some of
>the sources of my own frustration and ennui with contemporary
>political theatrics:
>
>http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=9389
>
>I may be missing a small part of my soul; the truth is that even when
>I was a student I had no time for marches and demonstrations. So not
>only was I not there - by default - in '68, I was not there on any of
>the occasions when I *could* have been there. I remember rolling my
>eyes once at a "March against Militarism". If one did not believe that
>Might made Right, why would one choose to express that non-belief by
>massing together a large number of bodies and throwing their
>collective weight around? The chap on the other side of the trestle
>table thought I had a very queer notion of what marching was all
>about. I don't know, though. I mistrust crowds. People get lost in
>them.
>
>One of the tricks the article misses is that the '68-ers' emphasis on
>authenticity was itself co-opted by the Reaganite right, retooled as
>competitive individualism. The author's line about "the authenticity
>of conscience pitted against the requirements of a pluralistic and
>con´Čéicted society" could be applied equally to the Reaganite creed.
>Every stockbroker a little existential hero. Quite a few of them were
>ex-Hippies into the bargain.
>
>Dominic
>--
>// Alas, this comparison function can't be total:
>// bottom is beyond comparison. - Oleg Kiselyov

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager