JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Archives


CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE Home

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE  2005

CYBER-SOCIETY-LIVE 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

[CSL]: Policy Post 11.13: Coalition Calls for Political Speech Pr otections

From:

J Armitage <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Interdisciplinary academic study of Cyber Society <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:53:59 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (182 lines)

From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of CDT Info
Sent: 06 June 2005 20:04
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Policy Post 11.13: Coalition Calls for Political Speech Protections

CDT POLICY POST Volume 11, Number 13, June 6, 2005

A BRIEFING ON PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES AFFECTING CIVIL LIBERTIES ONLINE
from
THE CENTER FOR DEMOCRACY AND TECHNOLOGY

CONTENTS:

(1) Coalition Calls for Political Speech Protections
(2) CDT Files Extensive Comments with Federal Election Commission
(3) Next Steps at FEC and in Congress
___________________________________________

(1) COALITION CALLS FOR POLITICAL SPEECH PROTECTIONS

On Friday, June 3, 2005, a broad and diverse coalition of advocacy 
groups, bloggers, and Internet users urged the Federal Election 
Commission (FEC) not to regulate the online political speech of 
ordinary people under the campaign finance laws.

Working with the Institute for Politics, Democracy & the Internet 
(IPDI) of George Washington University, CDT drafted a Joint Statement 
of Principles to guide the FEC (and ultimately Congress) in 
considering any application of campaign finance laws to individuals' 
speech online. Among the leading organizations that signed the 
principles are the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic 
Frontier Foundation, the National Taxpayers Union, the People for the 
American Way, and the Personal Democracy Forum.  More than 1,100 
bloggers and other individuals - from across the political spectrum - 
joined the statement as well.

Among the most critical points in the Statement of Principles 
submitted to the FEC:

*  robust online political activity by ordinary people strengthens 
and supports the central goal of campaign finance laws by diluting 
the strength and power of big money voices;

*  bloggers and other individuals should be able to express their 
political views online without concern about the campaign finance 
laws and without needed to consult an attorney;

*  the FEC should refrain from regulating online political speech 
unless and until there is concrete evidence that such speech is 
harming the election system, and then any regulation should be 
narrowly focused on the specific problem;

* individuals should  be able to collaborate on politically-oriented 
blogs and web sites without becoming subject to laws regulating 
"political committees."

The Joint Statement of Principles is available at 
http://www.cdt.org/speech/political/20050603cdt-ipdu.pdf.
_____________________________________________

(2) CDT FILES EXTENSIVE COMMENTS WITH FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In addition to the Joint Statement of Principles, on June 3rd CDT 
also submitted on its own behalf detailed comments addressing a broad 
range of specific issues raised by the FEC in March, when it issued a 
"Notice of Proposed Rulemaking" proposing to extend the campaign 
finance laws to a limited category of online speech.  Although the 
FEC's proposal was intended to be narrowly focused, it nevertheless 
raised a host of concerns.

For example, the FEC proposed regulating paid advertisements placed 
on a third party's web site.  A focus on paid advertisements makes 
sense in the offline world - where ads usually cost tens or hundreds 
of thousands of dollars.  But as CDT documented in its comments to 
the FEC, individuals can purchase political ads for as low as $10, 
and the FEC's proposal would discourage the use of this type of 
"online bumper sticker."  In its filing, CDT proposed that the FEC 
designate a monetary threshold below which online ads would not be 
regulated.

An overarching focus of CDT's comments to the FEC is the critical 
need to establish an easy to understand "bright line" rule protecting 
the online political speech of individuals.  The campaign finance 
laws are both voluminous and very complex, and it is unrealistic to 
expect that the millions of politically active Internet users would 
be able to wade through the regulations and figure out how they 
apply.  CDT argued to the FEC that it is essential that there be a 
single, simple statement of any obligations that might apply to 
ordinary citizens.

CDT's Comments also emphasized the unique contribution that the 
Internet is making to the political process.  It has greatly expanded 
the participation of ordinary citizens in the political process, and 
has opened up a huge diversity of alternative sources for political 
news and opinion.  As the last election showed, the Internet is a 
powerful forum for democratic discourse, making it possible for 
millions of ordinary Americans to have a real voice in electoral 
politics and to have access to an extraordinary array of news and 
opinion, delivered by bloggers and alternative media sources. 
Ultimately, CDT believes that the Internet furthers the prime goals 
of the campaign finance laws, and is part of the solution, not part 
of the problem.

CDT's Comments to the FEC are available at 
http://www.cdt.org/speech/political/20050603cdtcomments.pdf

The FEC's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is available at 
http://www.fec.gov/pdf/nprm/internet_comm/notice_2005-10.pdf
____________________________________________

(3) NEXT STEPS AT FEC AND IN CONGRESS

CDT has asked to testify at the FEC's planned hearings in its 
rulemaking on June 28 and 29, 2005.  We hope to further emphasize to 
the FEC the need to protect individuals' online speech, in a clear 
and easy-to-understand way.

CDT will also continue to work with the diverse coalition of 
organizations that are concerned about the impact of the campaign 
finance laws on individuals.  Although there is broad agreement that 
individuals' online speech should be protected, there is not 
agreement about how best to do so.  By continuing the dialog with 
groups and individuals representing a broad range of perspectives, we 
hope to be able to develop consensus about ways to protect 
individuals.

Utlimately, CDT believes that Congress may have to amend the campaign 
finance laws to make clear that the speech of ordinary Internet users 
is not covered.  Although CDT has urged the FEC to issue a very clear 
ruling, the ability of the FEC to do so may be hampered by 
requirements in the laws that the FEC is not free to change.  There 
have been some proposals in Congress to protect Internet speech, and 
CDT plans to work with members of Congress to develop a solution that 
protects individuals' speech without opening large campaign finance 
loopholes for candidates and political parties.

For more information: http://www.cdt.org/speech/political/ and 
http://fec.cdt.org.
____________________________________________

Detailed information about online civil liberties issues may be found 
at http://www.cdt.org/.

This document may be redistributed freely in full or linked to 
http://www.cdt.org/publications/policyposts/11/13 .

Excerpts may be re-posted with prior permission of [log in to unmask]

Policy Post 11.13 Copyright 2005 Center for Democracy and Technology

_______________________________________________
http://www.cdt.org/mailman/listinfo/policy-posts

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous
content by the NorMAN MailScanner Service and is believed
to be clean.

The NorMAN MailScanner Service is operated by Information
Systems and Services, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.


====
This e-mail is intended solely for the addressee. It may contain private and
confidential information. If you are not the intended addressee, please take
no action based on it nor show a copy to anyone. Please reply to this e-mail
to highlight the error. You should also be aware that all electronic mail
from, to, or within Northumbria University may be the subject of a request
under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and related legislation, and
therefore may be required to be disclosed to third parties.
This e-mail and attachments have been scanned for viruses prior to leaving
Northumbria University. Northumbria University will not be liable for any
losses as a result of any viruses being passed on.

************************************************************************************
Distributed through Cyber-Society-Live [CSL]: CSL is a moderated discussion
list made up of people who are interested in the interdisciplinary academic
study of Cyber Society in all its manifestations.To join the list please visit:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/cyber-society-live.html
*************************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
June 2022
May 2022
March 2022
February 2022
October 2021
July 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager