Tim,
On 2004 Oct 1 , at 12.01, Tim Jenness wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Norman Gray wrote:
>
>> It looks like I'll need to take a further look at ECHOMOP -- it looks
>> as if the documentation's more comprehensively messed up than I
>> thought. Also, I thought I'd got the monoliths working OK, but ...
>
> It was using a "raw" $(ALINK) which seemed to be dropping $FCFLAGS.
> Simply calling it a _MONOLITH is the current idiom and a lot less
> Makefile
> to write.
I spotted you'd changed that. That does indeed sound much better. I
wonder why I did it the other way before -- I probably just followed
the original makefile thoughtlessly.
See you,
Norman
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman Gray : Physics & Astronomy, Glasgow University, UK
http://www.astro.gla.ac.uk/users/norman/ : www.starlink.ac.uk
|