JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SOCIAL-POLICY Archives


SOCIAL-POLICY Archives

SOCIAL-POLICY Archives


SOCIAL-POLICY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SOCIAL-POLICY Home

SOCIAL-POLICY Home

SOCIAL-POLICY  October 2004

SOCIAL-POLICY October 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

New Deal needed for low paid - minimum wage won't solve the problem

From:

Suriya Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Suriya Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 22 Oct 2004 11:42:39 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (110 lines)

“NEW DEAL” NEEDED FOR LOW PAID:
MINIMUM WAGE WON’T SOLVE THE PROBLEM
The National Minimum Wage and Government tax credits will not be enough to
solve the problem of poverty pay, a new report warns today.
“Why Worry Any More about the Low Paid?” published by the New Policy
Institute [1], shows that:
&#9679; The National Minimum Wage (NMW) is too low to ensure that employees
are free of poverty without means-tested support – “at £4.85 the NMW falls
short of that level even for a single adult working full time”.  The very
low level at which the NMW was introduced in 1999 meant that it benefited
around one million low paid workers - not the two million which the Low Pay
Commission expected at the time.
&#9679; An hourly wage rate in the range £6 to £7 per hour is needed if
most employees are to escape poverty on the basis of their earnings.  Even
with the NMW rising by 7% a year (as it has in both 2003 and 2004), it
would take five years just to reach the bottom of that range.
&#9679; Tax credits “treat the symptoms of low pay, namely household
poverty, without treating the problem itself .. by subsidising the
employers of low paid workers, tax credits not only make low pay work
economically possible, they create disincentives for employers to do
anything about it”.
The report calculates that there are up to seven million low paid workers
in the UK (defined as earning less than £6 to £7 an hour).  Of these, more
than four million are women.  Three million are part-time workers, of whom
80% are women.
Although the largest sector for low pay is the retail and wholesale sector,
one quarter of all low paid workers are in public sector jobs, generally in
health, education and social work.  Many more are employed by private
contractors working for the public sector.
The report also presents evidence on the many other disadvantages faced by
low paid employees.  These include: reduced access to training
[2];insecurity at work [3];denial of rights [4] and much lower levels of
trade union representation [5].  “The emphasis on moving people from
welfare to work as the cornerstone of the anti-poverty strategy has tended
to blunt critical analysis of the quality of the jobs that are accessible
to people moving into employment”.
The report calls on the Government to launch a ‘New Deal for the Low Paid’
with the aim of ensuring that employers in both the public and private
sector take responsibility for improving the pay and conditions of low paid
jobs.  Key elements include:
&#9679; A leading role for the public sector, both as direct employer of
many low paid workers and as purchaser of services from firms who employ
many more.  The scale of public sector employment, especially in deprived
areas, will put pressure on private sector employers, who are competing for
much of the same labour, to follow suit.
&#9679; Stronger enforcement of workplace rights, to help low paid worker
who are more vulnerable to infringement of rights, but less well-placed to
take action to remedy the situation.
&#9679; The Low Pay Commission to continue on the course it set in 2003,
increasing the minimum wage faster than earnings, so helping with the
extreme end of low pay.
&#9679; The Trade Union movement as a whole raising the level of union
membership among the low paid, and ensuring that their interests are
properly promoted.
The report has been welcomed by trade unions and anti-poverty organisations.
TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber [6] said:
"This timely pamphlet identifies a problem that demands new policies and
approaches from Government, unions and employers. Low pay, low quality jobs
and low productivity workplaces are all connected, and demand a response
that combines tax credits, the minimum wage, better employment rights and a
positive role for the public sector.  As unionised workplaces tend to be
better paid workplaces than those without a union presence, unions need to
make the recruitment of low-paid workers a priority if we are to strive
towards removing all workers from a life of poverty."
Kate Green, [7] Chief Executive of the Child Poverty Action Group, said:
“Tackling low pay is fundamental to ensuring that the Government's welfare-
to-work policies achieve a reduction in family poverty.  The goals of
halving child poverty by 2010 and eliminating it by 2020 will not be
reached so long as employers are allowed to go on paying poverty wages. ”
Commenting, NPI Director and co-author of the report, Dr Peter Kenway [8]
said:
“The minimum wage and the system of tax credits were a powerful way for
Labour to launch its assault on poverty in the late 1990s but they have led
some people to believe that the problem of low pay has now been dealt
with.  Our evidence shows that this is not so.”
Co-author of the report, Catherine Howarth [9], added:
“The day-to-day experience of people in low paid jobs in this country
remains a struggle despite the minimum wage and tax credits.  A New Deal
for the Low Paid  would make a real difference to the lives of millions of
people”.

NOTES:
(1)"Why Worry Any More about the Low Paid?” by Catherine Howarth and Peter
Kenway, is published by the New Policy Institute.  For an embargoed copy,
email [log in to unmask]  Free copies for download will be available
from www.npi.org.uk.  References to the site are much appreciated.
(2)For example, only 10% of workers with no qualifications receive job-
related training in a typical three-month period, one quarter the rate for
those with a degree.
(3)For example, 40% of people making a new claim for Job Seekers’ Allowance
were last claiming the benefit less than six months previously;
(4)For example, failure to provide a written contract is far more common
amongst low paying employers in sectors with high staff turnover
(5)Among those on £6 an hour or less, barely 15% belong a to a union,
compared with more than 40% among those earning £10 to £20 an hour.
(6)Quotation via Liz Chinchen, Senior Media Officer, TUC, 020 7467 1388, or
mobile 07778 158175 or [log in to unmask])
(7)For further comment, Kate Green, CPAG Chief Executive, can be reached
via the CPAG press office (contact Ashley Riley) on 020 7812 5216 or mobile
07811 324339)
(8)For further comment or information on the report, contact Peter Kenway,
Director, New Policy Institute (020 7721 8421 or mobile 07711 068744 or
[log in to unmask]) or Catherine Howarth (mobile 07753 833827).
(9)Catherine Howarth is a Community Organiser for TELCO (The East London
Communities Organisation) and writes here in a personal capacity.

Press Release issued by the New Policy Institute, 109 Coppergate House, 16
Brune Street, London E1 7NJ.  Telephone 020 7721 8421.  Fax 020 7721 8422.
Email: [log in to unmask]  Website: www.npi.org.uk

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager