On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Malcolm J. Currie wrote:
> A user was bemoaning the lack of the Figaro command wascii except on old
> Solaris boxes. Upon further investigation, it's part of CGS4DR. Now I
> notice that we don't even have CGS4DR in applications/obselete or SUN/27
> in docs/obsolete. Was this a deliberate decision? Do we need to retain
> any of CGS4DR for posterity?
No deliberate decision has been taken concerning which applications go
into obsolete since I'm the only person who's been putting things into
obsolete and I ran out of time (and Fross was giving me a hard time over
the ports of CHART, IRCAMDR and IRAS90 to linux rather than doing
something "useful" like porting Starlink to 64bit :-). I'm assuming that
all the Starlink apps should go in CVS somewhere, especially now that
Peter found all the source code. RGASP is the only application that is
lacking source code.
As for SUN/27, I did make the decision not to put that in docs/obsolete
until CGS4DR was actually in applications/obsolete [documents for obsolete
applications should go with the obsolete application, not a separate docs
tree]
--
Tim Jenness
JAC software
http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
|