All,
Well I think this list should be open because it gives a good indication of
the amount of good work that is going on in Starlink, if anyone is
interested. I would say only post development issues to the list, which is
what it is for.
Steve.
-----Original Message-----
From: Starlink development [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tim
Jenness
Sent: 16 September 2004 20:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: IVOA meeting (was Re: are subdir configure.ac files needed?)
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Norman Gray wrote:
> This probably won't end up on Google, therefore, but there's nothing to
> stop someone leaving a URL pointing to the archive somewhere (indeed,
> I'm sure I've done it myself in CVS commit messages), and someone could
> find the list and browse away.
>
I've pointed Andy Gibb at the archive so he can follow the 64bit
discussion (he's the SCUBA-2 pipeline person), so it's not beyond the
realms of probability for this to happen.
> It's not terribly likely, of course, but just because the list hasn't
> shown up in Google doesn't mean it's invisible. Mmmmm, I really would
> be happier if this list was behind even a simple password.
>
Can we be a bit stronger than that and say:
STEVE CAN YOU PLEASE ADD PASSWORD PROTECTION TO THE MAIL ARCHIVE ?
How about that? It would also be worth fixing all the other outstanding
admin issues rather than continually wasting time vaguely asking for
something to happen (commit mailing lists, public/private wiki areas,
general discussion mailing list for outside users and non-"inner circle"
developers, moving the OSX discussion list to starlink). I'm sure I've
forgotten something.
--
Tim Jenness
JAC software
http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/~timj
|